Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91473
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineering-
dc.creatorIvanov, ML-
dc.creatorPeng, W-
dc.creatorWang, Q-
dc.creatorChow, WK-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:53:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:53:58Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91473-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ivanov, M.L.; Peng, W.; Wang, Q.; Chow, W.K. Sustainable Smoke Extraction System for Atrium: A Numerical Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7406 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137406en_US
dc.subjectAtriumen_US
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen_US
dc.subjectNatural venten_US
dc.subjectNumerical simulationen_US
dc.subjectSmoke extraction systemen_US
dc.titleSustainable smoke extraction system for atrium : a numerical studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue13-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13137406-
dcterms.abstractSmoke extraction systems, either static with natural ventilation, or dynamic with mechanical ventilation are required to keep smoke layer at high levels in many tall atria. It is observed that a design fire with high heat release rate (HRR) is commonly used for designing natural vents, but a low HRR is used for mechanical ventilation system. This will not produce a sustainable environment. There are no internationally agreed on design guides to determine the HRR in the design fire for different extraction systems and scenarios. This issue will be studied using a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-based software, the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) version 6.7.1. Simulations on natural smoke filling, static and dynamic smoke extractions were carried out in a big example atrium. CFD-FDS predictions were compared with previous full-scale burning tests. Results confirmed that static smoke extraction is a good option for big fires, and a dynamic system is best for small fires. A sustainable new hybrid design combining the advantages of static and dynamic systems is proposed, which could result in a lower smoke temperature and higher smoke layer interface height, indicating a better extraction design.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, July 2021, v. 13, no. 13, 7406-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainability-
dcterms.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85110777372-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.artn7406-
dc.description.validate202110 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-13-07406-v2.pdf2.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

132
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

341
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.