Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91473
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering | - |
dc.creator | Ivanov, ML | - |
dc.creator | Peng, W | - |
dc.creator | Wang, Q | - |
dc.creator | Chow, WK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-03T06:53:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-03T06:53:58Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91473 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Ivanov, M.L.; Peng, W.; Wang, Q.; Chow, W.K. Sustainable Smoke Extraction System for Atrium: A Numerical Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7406 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137406 | en_US |
dc.subject | Atrium | en_US |
dc.subject | Mechanical ventilation | en_US |
dc.subject | Natural vent | en_US |
dc.subject | Numerical simulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Smoke extraction system | en_US |
dc.title | Sustainable smoke extraction system for atrium : a numerical study | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su13137406 | - |
dcterms.abstract | Smoke extraction systems, either static with natural ventilation, or dynamic with mechanical ventilation are required to keep smoke layer at high levels in many tall atria. It is observed that a design fire with high heat release rate (HRR) is commonly used for designing natural vents, but a low HRR is used for mechanical ventilation system. This will not produce a sustainable environment. There are no internationally agreed on design guides to determine the HRR in the design fire for different extraction systems and scenarios. This issue will be studied using a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-based software, the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) version 6.7.1. Simulations on natural smoke filling, static and dynamic smoke extractions were carried out in a big example atrium. CFD-FDS predictions were compared with previous full-scale burning tests. Results confirmed that static smoke extraction is a good option for big fires, and a dynamic system is best for small fires. A sustainable new hybrid design combining the advantages of static and dynamic systems is proposed, which could result in a lower smoke temperature and higher smoke layer interface height, indicating a better extraction design. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Sustainability, July 2021, v. 13, no. 13, 7406 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Sustainability | - |
dcterms.issued | 2021-07 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85110777372 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2071-1050 | - |
dc.identifier.artn | 7406 | - |
dc.description.validate | 202110 bcvc | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_Scopus/WOS | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
sustainability-13-07406-v2.pdf | 2.44 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
69
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024
Downloads
44
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.