Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91402
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.creatorChen, Z-
dc.creatorZhuang, Y-
dc.creatorXu, Z-
dc.creatorChan, LYL-
dc.creatorZhang, S-
dc.creatorYe, Q-
dc.creatorFeng, L-
dc.creatorLu, ZL-
dc.creatorLi, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:53:21Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91402-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chen Z, Zhuang Y, Xu Z, Chan LYL, Zhang S, Ye Q, Feng L, Lu Z-L, Li J. Sensitivity and stability of functional vision tests in detecting subtle changes under multiple simulated conditions. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(7):7 is available at https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.7en_US
dc.subjectContrast sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectCSV-1000en_US
dc.subjectQuick CSFen_US
dc.subjectSubtle changes of visionen_US
dc.subjectVisual acuityen_US
dc.titleSensitivity and stability of functional vision tests in detecting subtle changes under multiple simulated conditionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/tvst.10.7.7-
dcterms.abstractPurpose: To explore whether subtle changes in visual quality can be detected using different measures of visual function against the quick contrast sensitivity function test (quick CSF).-
dcterms.abstractMethods: Sixty participants, aged 17 to 34 years, were enrolled. Participants’ vision was degraded by 0.25 D undercorrection (0.25 D), 60% neutral density filter brightness reduction (60% ND), and 0.8 Bangerter foil optical diffusion (0.8BAN). Visual function tests including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E and quick CSF) were measured with participant’s best-corrected vision and under simulated visual degradation conditions. Test sensitivities in detecting differences were compared.-
dcterms.abstractResults: Statistically significant visual acuity degradation was observed in the 0.8BAN condition only (Pcorrected < 0.001). With CSV-1000E and outliers removed, significant CS degradation was observed in all spatial frequencies, area under log CSF (AULCSF) in the 0.8BAN condition (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all), medium and high spatial frequencies and AULCSF in the 60%ND condition (Pcorrected, 6cpd = 0.002, Pcorrected, 12cpd = 0.005, Pcorrected, 18cpd = 0.001, Pcorrected, AULCSF < 0.001) and the 0.25 D condition (Pcorrected, 6cpd = 0.011, Pcorrected, 12cpd =0.013, Pcorrected, 18cpd =0.015, Pcorrected, AULCSF <0.001).With the quick CSF, significant CS degradation was observed in all simulated visual conditions in all spatial frequencies, cutoff frequency and AULCSF (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all). Test-retest reliability of the quick CSF method was high; coefficient of repeatability ranged from 0.14 to 0.18 logCS.-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: Compared with visual acuity and chart-based CS tests, the quick CSF method provided more reliable and sensitive measures to detect small visual changes.-
dcterms.abstractTranslational Relevance: The quick CSF method can provide sensitive and reliable measures to monitor disease progression and assess treatment outcomes.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTranslational vision science & technology, June 2021, v. 10, no. 7, 7-
dcterms.isPartOfTranslational vision science & technology-
dcterms.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108574252-
dc.identifier.eissn2164-2591-
dc.identifier.artn7-
dc.description.validate202110 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
i2164-2591-10-7-7_1623056397.69927.pdf820.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

105
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

Downloads

63
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
Citations as of Jun 26, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.