Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91402
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.creatorChen, Z-
dc.creatorZhuang, Y-
dc.creatorXu, Z-
dc.creatorChan, LYL-
dc.creatorZhang, S-
dc.creatorYe, Q-
dc.creatorFeng, L-
dc.creatorLu, ZL-
dc.creatorLi, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:53:21Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91402-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chen Z, Zhuang Y, Xu Z, Chan LYL, Zhang S, Ye Q, Feng L, Lu Z-L, Li J. Sensitivity and stability of functional vision tests in detecting subtle changes under multiple simulated conditions. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(7):7 is available at https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.7en_US
dc.subjectContrast sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectCSV-1000en_US
dc.subjectQuick CSFen_US
dc.subjectSubtle changes of visionen_US
dc.subjectVisual acuityen_US
dc.titleSensitivity and stability of functional vision tests in detecting subtle changes under multiple simulated conditionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/tvst.10.7.7-
dcterms.abstractPurpose: To explore whether subtle changes in visual quality can be detected using different measures of visual function against the quick contrast sensitivity function test (quick CSF).-
dcterms.abstractMethods: Sixty participants, aged 17 to 34 years, were enrolled. Participants’ vision was degraded by 0.25 D undercorrection (0.25 D), 60% neutral density filter brightness reduction (60% ND), and 0.8 Bangerter foil optical diffusion (0.8BAN). Visual function tests including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E and quick CSF) were measured with participant’s best-corrected vision and under simulated visual degradation conditions. Test sensitivities in detecting differences were compared.-
dcterms.abstractResults: Statistically significant visual acuity degradation was observed in the 0.8BAN condition only (Pcorrected < 0.001). With CSV-1000E and outliers removed, significant CS degradation was observed in all spatial frequencies, area under log CSF (AULCSF) in the 0.8BAN condition (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all), medium and high spatial frequencies and AULCSF in the 60%ND condition (Pcorrected, 6cpd = 0.002, Pcorrected, 12cpd = 0.005, Pcorrected, 18cpd = 0.001, Pcorrected, AULCSF < 0.001) and the 0.25 D condition (Pcorrected, 6cpd = 0.011, Pcorrected, 12cpd =0.013, Pcorrected, 18cpd =0.015, Pcorrected, AULCSF <0.001).With the quick CSF, significant CS degradation was observed in all simulated visual conditions in all spatial frequencies, cutoff frequency and AULCSF (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all). Test-retest reliability of the quick CSF method was high; coefficient of repeatability ranged from 0.14 to 0.18 logCS.-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: Compared with visual acuity and chart-based CS tests, the quick CSF method provided more reliable and sensitive measures to detect small visual changes.-
dcterms.abstractTranslational Relevance: The quick CSF method can provide sensitive and reliable measures to monitor disease progression and assess treatment outcomes.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTranslational vision science & technology, June 2021, v. 10, no. 7, 7-
dcterms.isPartOfTranslational vision science & technology-
dcterms.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108574252-
dc.identifier.eissn2164-2591-
dc.identifier.artn7-
dc.description.validate202110 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
i2164-2591-10-7-7_1623056397.69927.pdf820.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

55
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

21
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.