Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorXue, W-
dc.creatorLiu, M-
dc.creatorPolitzer-Ahles, S-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Xue, Liu and Politzer-Ahles. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) ( The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Xue W, Liu M and Politzer-Ahles S (2021) Processing of Complement Coercion With Aspectual Verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence From a Self-Paced Reading Study. Front. Psychol. 12:643571 is available at
dc.subjectAspectual verbsen_US
dc.subjectComplement coercionen_US
dc.subjectMandarin Chineseen_US
dc.subjectSelf-paced readingen_US
dc.subjectSemantic enrichmenten_US
dc.subjectType mismatchen_US
dc.titleProcessing of complement coercion with aspectual verbs in Mandarin Chinese : evidence from a self-paced reading studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines whether Chinese complement coercion sentences with aspectual verbs will elicit processing difficulty during real-time comprehension. Complement coercion is a linguistic phenomenon in which certain verbs (e.g., start, enjoy), requiring an event-denoting complement, are combined with an entity-denoting complement (e.g., book), as in The author started a book. Previous studies have reported that the entity-denoting complement elicited processing difficulty following verbs that require event argument compared with verbs that do not (e.g., The author wrote a book). While the processing of complement coercion has been extensively studied in Indo-European languages such as English and German, it is relatively under-researched in Sino-Tibetan languages such as Mandarin Chinese. Given the fact that there are many linguistic elements behaving distinctly in the different language families, for instance, verbs with respect to their semantic properties and syntactic representations of the complement, it is meaningful to investigate whether or not the existing linguistic differences have any effect on the processing of complement coercion in Mandarin. With this research goal, we recorded self-paced reading time of 61 native Mandarin speakers to investigate the processing of the entity-denoting complement in sentences with three different verb types (aspectual verbs which require an event-denoting complement, preferred verbs which denote a preferred interpretation of the aspectual expressions, and non-preferred verbs which denote a non-preferred but plausible interpretation of the aspectual expressions), as exemplified in 顾客开始/填写/查看这份问卷 gù-kè kāi-shǐ/tián-xiě/chá-kàn zhè-fèn wèn-juàn “The customer started/filled in/checked the questionnaire.” It was found that the entity noun complement (e.g., 这份问卷 zhè-fèn wèn-juàn “the questionnaire”) elicited significantly longer reading times in coercion sentences than non-coercion counterparts. The results are compatible with the previous findings in English that complement coercion sentences impose processing cost during real-time comprehension. The study contributes empirical evidence to coercion studies cross-linguistically.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrontiers in psychology, May 2021, v. 12, 643571-
dcterms.isPartOfFrontiers in psychology-
dc.description.validate202110 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fpsyg-12-643571.pdf607.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

Citations as of Jun 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.