Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91277
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Finance-
dc.creatorPeng, B-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T08:21:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-02T08:21:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91277-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Peng, B. (2021). Positional competition: A theory of the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 186, 562-575 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.003en_US
dc.subjectEquality of opportunitiesen_US
dc.subjectHappinessen_US
dc.subjectInequalityen_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.subjectPower law distributionsen_US
dc.subjectSuperstar effecten_US
dc.titlePositional competition : a theory of the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradoxen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage562-
dc.identifier.epage575-
dc.identifier.volume186-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.003-
dcterms.abstractThis paper provides a novel theory that simultaneously explains the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox, demonstrating that these two phenomena could be driven by the same mechanism. I model positional competition, in which productive opportunities are allocated according to relative performance, as a Nash equilibrium outcome of agents reacting optimally to a distribution of productive opportunities. Positional competition is not a zero-sum game and its intensity is endogenously determined. The distribution of income and intergenerational mobility are also endogenously determined, with income following a power law distribution. As productivities become more dispersed, optimizing agents respond by competing more intensely with each other. This endogenous intensification lies at the heart of my explanation for both the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of economic behavior & organization, June 2021, v. 186, p. 562-575-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of economic behavior & organization-
dcterms.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105268440-
dc.description.validate202110 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S016726812100144X-main.pdf630.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

42
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

18
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.