Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91277
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | School of Accounting and Finance | - |
dc.creator | Peng, B | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-02T08:21:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-02T08:21:56Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-2681 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91277 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Peng, B. (2021). Positional competition: A theory of the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 186, 562-575 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.003 | en_US |
dc.subject | Equality of opportunities | en_US |
dc.subject | Happiness | en_US |
dc.subject | Inequality | en_US |
dc.subject | Mobility | en_US |
dc.subject | Power law distributions | en_US |
dc.subject | Superstar effect | en_US |
dc.title | Positional competition : a theory of the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 562 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 575 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 186 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.003 | - |
dcterms.abstract | This paper provides a novel theory that simultaneously explains the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox, demonstrating that these two phenomena could be driven by the same mechanism. I model positional competition, in which productive opportunities are allocated according to relative performance, as a Nash equilibrium outcome of agents reacting optimally to a distribution of productive opportunities. Positional competition is not a zero-sum game and its intensity is endogenously determined. The distribution of income and intergenerational mobility are also endogenously determined, with income following a power law distribution. As productivities become more dispersed, optimizing agents respond by competing more intensely with each other. This endogenous intensification lies at the heart of my explanation for both the Great Gatsby curve and the Easterlin paradox. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of economic behavior & organization, June 2021, v. 186, p. 562-575 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of economic behavior & organization | - |
dcterms.issued | 2021-06 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85105268440 | - |
dc.description.validate | 202110 bcvc | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_Scopus/WOS | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S016726812100144X-main.pdf | 630.83 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
75
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of May 11, 2025
Downloads
42
Citations as of May 11, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
Citations as of May 8, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.