Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91030
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorChan, Jen_US
dc.creatorDistelhorst, Gen_US
dc.creatorKessler, Den_US
dc.creatorLee, Jen_US
dc.creatorMartin-Ortega, Oen_US
dc.creatorPawlicki, Pen_US
dc.creatorSelden, Men_US
dc.creatorSelwyn, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T03:07:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-06T03:07:07Z-
dc.identifier.issn0896-9205en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91030-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Chan J, Distelhorst G, Kessler D, et al. After the Foxconn Suicides in China: A Roundtable on Labor, the State and Civil Society in Global Electronics. Critical Sociology. 2022;48(2):211-233 Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. DOI: 10.1177/08969205211013442en_US
dc.subjectSuicideen_US
dc.subjectGlobal electronics productionen_US
dc.subjectGlobal value chainsen_US
dc.subjectLabor rightsen_US
dc.subjectMigrant workersen_US
dc.subjectStudent internsen_US
dc.subjectCorporate responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectPublic procurementen_US
dc.subjectThe Chinese stateen_US
dc.titleAfter the Foxconn suicides in China : a roundtable on labor, the state and civil society in global electronicsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage211en_US
dc.identifier.epage233en_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/08969205211013442en_US
dcterms.abstractWe seek to tackle myriad problems of a global production system in which China is the world’s largest producer and exporter of consumer electronics products. Dying for an iPhone simultaneously addresses the challenges facing Chinese workers while locating them within the global economy through an assessment of the relationship between Foxconn (the largest electronics manufacturer) and Apple (one of the richest corporations). Eight researchers from Asia, Europe and North America discuss two main questions: How do tech behemoths and the Chinese state shape labor relations in transnational manufacturing? What roles can workers, public sector buyers, non-governmental organizations and consumers play in holding multinational corporations and states accountable for human rights violations and assuring the protection of worker interests? We also reflect on the possibility that national governments, the electronics industry and civil society groups can collaborate to contribute to improved labor rights in China and the world.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCritical sociology, 1 Mar. 2022, v. 48, no. 2, p, 211-233en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCritical sociologyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-03-01-
dc.identifier.eissn1569-1632en_US
dc.description.validate202109 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1020-n01, a1191-n02-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44130-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chan_et_al_2022_CS.pdfPre-Published version776.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

123
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

340
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.