Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90039
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHou, HCen_US
dc.creatorLai, JHKen_US
dc.creatorEdwards, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T08:20:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-18T08:20:26Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90039-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hou, H., Lai, J. H. K., & Edwards, D. (2020). Gap theory based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) of dormitory building performance: A case study and a comparative analysis. Building and Environment, 185, 107312 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107312.en_US
dc.subjectAdaptationen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectPOEen_US
dc.subjectStudenten_US
dc.subjectUniversityen_US
dc.subjectUseren_US
dc.titleGap theory based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) of dormitory building performance : a case study and a comparative analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume185en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107312en_US
dcterms.abstractStudent housing significantly influences the quality and competitiveness of the university education environment. Whereas the traditional post-occupancy evaluations (POEs) of buildings have typically focussed on investigating users' satisfaction, an earlier study developed the gap theory based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) method, by which both the users' expectation and satisfaction (viz. performance gap) of a university dormitory were investigated. To validate the applicability of the GTbPOE method, further research was undertaken to evaluate the building performance of another dormitory. Using face-to-face interviews, responses of 104 dormitory users were collected, of which the relative importance ratings of six essential aspects (namely: visual comfort, thermal comfort, aural comfort, fire safety, hygiene, and communication via information technology) were analyzed via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A series of gap analyses on the users' expectation and satisfaction levels corroborated the existence of the adaptation effect on the users’ perception: that is, the longer the stay, the smaller the performance gap. A comparative analysis on the findings between the two dormitories - one from the earlier study and the other from the present study - further demonstrated the usefulness of the GTbPOE method in benchmarking building performance. Adoption of this method in future POE studies will enable reliable identification of any shortcoming in building performance and hence, can form the basis for improvement measures to augment the performance of buildings within the built environment.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, Nov. 2020, v. 185, 107312en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091643968-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn107312en_US
dc.description.validate202105 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0674-n06-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hou_Gap_Theory_Post-occupancy.pdfPre-Published version2.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

105
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

52
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.