Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89650
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorShao, Jen_US
dc.creatorMak, CYen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T01:17:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-28T01:17:20Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9911967-6-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89650-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCognitive Science Societyen_US
dc.rightsPosted with the permission of the authoren_US
dc.subjectTalker similarityen_US
dc.subjecthigh variability trainingen_US
dc.subjectCantonese lexical tonesen_US
dc.subjectMandarin leaners of Cantoneseen_US
dc.subjectMental representationen_US
dc.titleThe role of talker similarity in the perceptual learning of L2 tone categoriesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage3125en_US
dc.identifier.epage3130en_US
dcterms.abstractDifferent hypotheses were proposed concerning the role of talker variability in lexical learning. It remains unclear whether new phonetic categories are acquired as episodic memory traces with talkers’ voice information preserved or as abstract categories. The current study investigated the role of voice similarity in perceptual learning of Cantonese tones. Six high-variability training sessions were given to 12 Mandarin speakers. Voice similarity was controlled in the training and pre-and posttests. Results indicate that the training positively transferred to both similar and dissimilar talkers. However, in the pretest, the performance was not significantly different between similar and dissimilar voices, whereas significant better performance was found in the similar voices in the posttest. These results suggest that learners retained speakers’ information in the learning process and made use of such information for future perception. This implies that lexical tones are probably encoded episodically in the mental representation of Mandarin L2 learners.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), CogSci 2017 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, London, UK, 26-29 July 2017, p. 3125-3130. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 2017en_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.relation.ispartofbookCogSci 2017 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, London, UK, 26-29 July 2017en_US
dc.relation.conferenceAnnual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Societyen_US
dc.description.validate202104 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0651-n13-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextRGC: 25603916en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
paper0590.pdf582.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

77
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

20
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.