Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89644
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Ken_US
dc.creatorSjerps MJen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Cen_US
dc.creatorPeng, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T01:17:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-28T01:17:16Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89644-
dc.descriptionSixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, 18-20 June 2018, Berlin, Germanyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsPosted with the permission of the publisher and authoren_US
dc.subjectSpeech normalizationen_US
dc.subjectLexical tonesen_US
dc.subjectVowelsen_US
dc.titleExtrinsic normalization of lexical tones and vowels : beyond a simple general contrastive perceptual mechanismen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage227en_US
dc.identifier.epage231en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21437/TAL.2018-46en_US
dcterms.abstractSpoken context provides valuable information for listeners to accommodate speech variability. One example of this influence is extrinsic normalization: the finding that formant and tone ranges in preceding context constrain the interpretation of subsequent tone and formant cues. One dominant hypothesis has been that contrastive general auditory processes play an important role in normalization. A contrastive general auditory mechanism suggests that speech and non-speech contexts should have similar contrastive influences on speech perception. The present study tests this prediction across segmental (formants) and suprasegmental (tone) speech cues. Participants listened to target stimuli that were preceded by either speech or non-speech contexts. Importantly, the cues that distinguished target stimuli were contrastively related to their context. The results demonstrate that speech contexts, but not non-speech context, induced significant contrastive effects on the perception of both lexical tones and formants. In addition, we observed considerable individual difference in the size and direction of context effects. Some listeners reliably demonstrated contrastive context effects while others demonstrated assimilative effects. These results suggest that the underlying mechanism of speech normalization is more complicated than simply contrastive general auditory processes.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn Proceedings of TAL2018, Sixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, p. 227-231en_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.relation.ispartofbookProceedings of TAL2018, Sixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languagesen_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages [TAL]en_US
dc.description.validate202104 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0651-n06, a1211-n12, CBS-0285en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44220-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS27780300en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0651-n06.pdf418.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

147
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

81
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.