Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89618
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorZhou, FCen_US
dc.creatorWang, CYen_US
dc.creatorUngvari, GSen_US
dc.creatorNg, CHen_US
dc.creatorZhou, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Len_US
dc.creatorZhou, Jen_US
dc.creatorShum, DHKen_US
dc.creatorMan, Den_US
dc.creatorLiu, DTen_US
dc.creatorLi, Jen_US
dc.creatorXiang, YTen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T06:08:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-13T06:08:54Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89618-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.titleLongitudinal changes in prospective memory and their clinical correlates at 1-year follow-up in first-episode schizophreniaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0172114en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study aimed to investigate prospective memory (PM) and the association with clinical factors at 1-year follow-up in first-episode schizophrenia (FES). Thirty-two FES patients recruited from a university-affiliated psychiatric hospital in Beijing and 17 healthy community controls (HCs) were included. Time- and event-based PM (TBPM and EBPM) performances were measured with the Chinese version of the Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CCAMPROMPT) at baseline and at one-year follow-up. A number of other neurocognitive tests were also administered. Remission was determined at the endpoint according to the PANSS score 3 for selected items. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction between time (baseline vs. endpoint) and group (FES vs. HCs) for EBPM (F(1, 44) = 8.8, p = 0.005) and for all neurocognitive components. Paired samples ttests showed significant improvement in EBPM in FES (13.1±3.7 vs. 10.3±4.8; t = 3.065, p = 0.004), compared to HCs (15.7±3.6 vs. 16.5±2.3; t = -1.248, p = 0.230). A remission rate of 59.4% was found in the FES group. Analysis of covariance revealed that remitters performed significantly better on EBPM (14.9±2.6 vs. 10.4±3.6; F(1, 25) = 12.2, p = 0.002) than non-remitters at study endpoint. The association between EBPM and 12-month clinical improvement in FES suggests that EBPM may be a potential neurocognitive marker for the effectiveness of standard pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, the findings also imply that PM may not be strictly a trait-related endophenotype as indicated in previous studies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS one, 28 Feb. 2017, v. 12, no. 2, e0172114en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS oneen_US
dcterms.issued2017-02-28-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000395980200011-
dc.identifier.ros2016003224-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.artne0172114en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2016003158-
dc.description.ros2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate202104 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0707-n27-
dc.identifier.SubFormID1185-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0707-n27_1185_pone.0172114.pdf747.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

153
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

21
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Jun 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.