Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89566
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.creatorMun, SGen_US
dc.creatorJang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-09T08:51:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-09T08:51:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn1354-8166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89566-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Mun, S. G., & Jang, S. (Shawn). (2022). Explaining the asset growth anomaly in the restaurant industry: Motivations and consequences. Tourism Economics, 28(1), 62–82. Copyright © 2020 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/1354816620954587.en_US
dc.subjectAsset growthen_US
dc.subjectAsset turnoveren_US
dc.subjectCEO compensationen_US
dc.subjectInvestment-Returnen_US
dc.subjectOverinvestmenten_US
dc.subjectReturn on asseten_US
dc.titleExplaining the asset growth anomaly in the restaurant industry : motivations and consequencesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage62en_US
dc.identifier.epage82en_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1354816620954587en_US
dcterms.abstractMany business leaders have the tendency to vigorously pursue rapid firm growth, but this focus is often criticized as problematic in terms of operating performance. Accordingly, this study suggested that the asset growth anomaly is an inevitable phenomenon for growing restaurant firms: operating profitability increases as assets grow to the optimum level and then decreases after this level. However, most restaurant firms invest their capital below the optimum level, and only a small number of restaurant firms increase their assets too rapidly. Further, the amount of a chief executive officer’s (CEO’s) bonus payments motivates their investments in asset growth, while the amount of stock options increases the probability of overinvestment practices in restaurant firms. Therefore, even though overinvestment practices are not apparent in most restaurant firms, an appropriate proportion of equity-based incentives is beneficial to prevent overinvestment practices by a few restaurant firms to avoid negatively impacting shareholders’ wealth.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTourism economics, Feb. 2022, v. 28, no. 1, p. 62-82en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTourism economicsen_US
dcterms.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090167742-
dc.identifier.eissn2044-0375en_US
dc.description.validate202104 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0667-n12-
dc.identifier.SubFormID859-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mun_Anomaly_Restaurant_Industry.pdfPre-Published version959.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

92
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

67
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.