Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89524
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorMu, QY-
dc.creatorDong, H-
dc.creatorLiao, HJ-
dc.creatorDang, YJ-
dc.creatorZhou, C-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-09T08:50:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-09T08:50:22Z-
dc.identifier.issn2045-2543-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89524-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherICE Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.en US
dc.rightsThe following publication Mu, Q. Y., Dong, H., Liao, H. J., Dang, Y. J., & Zhou, C. (2020). Water-retention curves of loess under wetting−drying cycles. Géotechnique Letters, 10(2), 135-140 is available at https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.19.00025.en US
dc.subjectFabric/structure of soilsen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory testsen_US
dc.subjectSuctionen_US
dc.titleWater-retention curves of loess under wetting-drying cyclesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1680/jgele.19.00025-
dcterms.abstractWater-retention curves (WRCs) of intact, compacted and reconstituted loess were investigated using a pressure plate extractor. All specimens were prepared having the same initial density and subjected to two cycles of drying and wetting in the suction range of 0-400 kPa. Furthermore, their pore-size distributions (PSDs) were measured through mercury intrusion porosimeter (MIP) for explaining the measured WRCs. The results show that the air-entry value of reconstituted loess is 505% and 169% larger than that of intact and compacted loess, respectively. This is because the reconstituted loess has more uniform PSD and lacks large-sized pores, as supported by the MIP measurements. On the other hand, the average degree of hysteresis of reconstituted loess during the second wetting-drying cycle decreases by 73% compared to that of the first cycle, which is attributed to the significant soil shrinkage (i.e. 28%) induced by the first wetting-drying cycle. On the contrary, the number of wetting-drying cycles shows negligible effects on the hysteresis of intact loess. In addition, the wetting-drying cycles influence the hysteresis of compacted loess only in a narrow suction range (i.e. 10-50 kPa).-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGeotechnique letters, June 2020, v. 10, no. 2, 25-
dcterms.isPartOfGeotechnique letters-
dcterms.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079342141-
dc.identifier.artn25-
dc.description.validate202104 bcvc-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0692-n09-
dc.identifier.SubFormID968-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGC-
dc.description.fundingText16207918-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0692-n09_968.pdfPre-Published version1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

93
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

123
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.