Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89365
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Affective engagement in metaphorical versus literal communication styles in counseling
Authors: Tay, D 
Issue Date: 2020
Source: Discourse processes, 2020, v. 57, no. 4, p. 360-375
Abstract: Metaphor theory bears many implications for counseling processes, but metaphor in extended counseling talk is seldom evaluated. This article reports an exploratory skin conductance and discourse analysis of metaphorical versus literal communication styles in facilitating affective engagement over time. After background interaction with the counselor-experimenter, role-playing clients (N = 60) were asked either a metaphorical or literal stimulus question related to the topic of academic problems. This was followed by spontaneous elaboration of either stimulus. A mixed-effects model with random subject intercepts suggests that both styles are tied to increased affective engagement, but the increase was significantly more apparent in the metaphorical style. However, no significant differences were found immediately after stimulus. The results are corroborated by a post-experiment survey where the metaphorical style was rated significantly better for expressing emotions and experiences and introducing new frames of reference. A further exploratory analysis of discourse features uncovered key components of the metaphorical style and their specific implications for engagement. The study suggests that a metaphorical style is more affectively engaging but requires sustained follow-up and spontaneous metaphor elaboration skills. Limitations are critically discussed, given the infancy of the present approach.
Publisher: Routledge
Journal: Discourse processes 
ISSN: 0163-853X
EISSN: 1532-6950
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1689086
Rights: © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes on 19 Nov 2019 (online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1689086.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0611-n04.pdfPre-Published version1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

18
Citations as of Jul 3, 2022

Downloads

10
Citations as of Jul 3, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of Jun 30, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Citations as of Jun 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.