Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89282
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorTsang, CSLen_US
dc.creatorChong, DYKen_US
dc.creatorPang, MYCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T07:39:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-05T07:39:13Z-
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89282-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Tsang, Charlotte Sau Lan, et al. “Cognitive-Motor Interference in Walking after Stroke: Test–Retest Reliability and Validity of Dual-Task Walking Assessments.” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 6, June 2019, pp. 1066–1078. Copyright © 2019 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/0269215519828146.en_US
dc.subjectDual-task interferenceen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.titleCognitive-motor interference in walking after stroke : test–retest reliability and validity of dual-task walking assessmentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1066en_US
dc.identifier.epage1078en_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269215519828146en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective: To explore the reliability and validity of a series of dual-task mobility assessments among individuals post-stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign: Observational study with repeated measures.en_US
dcterms.abstractSetting: University laboratory.en_US
dcterms.abstractParticipants: Thirty community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractInterventions: Not applicable.en_US
dcterms.abstractMain Measures: Each of the two mobility tasks (1-minute level-ground walking with and without obstacle-negotiation) was performed concurrently with each of the eight cognitive tasks (auditory Stroop test, serial subtraction, shopping list recall and category naming at two difficulty levels). Walking distance and obstacle hitting rate (OHR) indicated dual-task mobility performance. Number of correct responses (NCR) indicated cognitive performance. Reaction time was additionally measured for the auditory Stroop test. Construct validity was examined by correlations between the dual-task assessments. The dual-task assessments were repeated within 7–14 days for test–retest reliability.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Excellent test–retest reliability in walking distance and OHR was found (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(3,1) = 0.891–0.984, P < 0.05). Moderate to excellent reliability was found in NCR and reaction time (ICC(3,1) = 0.480–0.911, P < 0.01). Correlations between walking distance were excellent (rs = 0.840–0.985, P < 0.01). Correlations of NCR and reaction time between low- and high-level cognitive tasks were mostly moderate to excellent (rs = 0.515–0.793, P < 0.01). Generally no significant correlations were found in NCR between the dual-task assessments with different cognitive domains.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The dual-task walking assessments are reliable and valid for evaluating cognitive-motor interference in community-dwelling individuals post-stroke. The lack of correlations between the tasks of different cognitive domains indicates the need of using different cognitive domains in dual-task walking assessment post-stroke.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationClinical rehabilitation, 1 June 2019, v. 33, no. 6, p. 1066-1078en_US
dcterms.isPartOfClinical rehabilitationen_US
dcterms.issued2019-06-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85061620630-
dc.identifier.pmid30722681-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-0873en_US
dc.description.validate202103 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0590-n39-
dc.identifier.SubFormID363-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextP0005026en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0590-n39_DTR Clinical Rehab Text, References, Tables and Clinical Messages_revision_v2.pdfPre-Published version792.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

71
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

25
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Apr 12, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of Apr 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.