Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89199
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorWuni, IYen_US
dc.creatorShen, GQen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T09:14:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-18T09:14:11Z-
dc.identifier.issn0961-3218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89199-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Building Research & Information on 25 Sep 2019 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09613218.2019.1669009en_US
dc.subjectCritical success factorsen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectModular integrated constructionen_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.titleCritical success factors for modular integrated construction projects: a reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage763en_US
dc.identifier.epage784en_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09613218.2019.1669009en_US
dcterms.abstractModular integrated construction (MiC) is an innovative construction approach which transforms the fragmented linear site-based construction of buildings into an integrated production and assembly of value-added prefabricated prefinished modules. As MiC has gained attention in the construction industry, more in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors (CSFs) for implementing MiC projects is imperative. This research reviewed studies on the CSFs for implementing MiC projects during the period 1993–2019. Analysis showed that the US, UK, Malaysia, Australia, and Hong Kong are the largest contributors to the MiC CSFs studies. Further analysis generated 35 CSFs for implementing MiC projects. Of these, the six most cited CSFs shared between countries and MiC projects include good working collaboration and effective communication among project participants; effective supply chain management; accurate design and early design freeze; involvement of key project participants throughout the project; suitable procurement strategy and contracting; and standardization & benchmarking of best practices. These shared CSFs can be used to develop decision support systems, enabling the prediction of project success. The developed checklists and conceptual model of the CSFs could help to guide and improve the successful implementation of MiC projects and may form a useful basis for future empirical studies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding research and information, 2020, v. 48, no. 7, p. 763-784en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding research and informationen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85073969860-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-4321en_US
dc.description.validate202102 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0547-n14-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextResearch Grants Council (Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme): PF17 – 00649en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wuni_Critical_Modular_Integrated.pdfPre-Published version1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

161
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

1,463
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

113
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

109
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.