Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89003
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorHossain, MU-
dc.creatorWang, L-
dc.creatorChen, L-
dc.creatorTsang, DCW-
dc.creatorNg, ST-
dc.creatorPoon, CS-
dc.creatorMechtcherine, V-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T07:14:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-15T07:14:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn0160-4120-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89003-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hossain, M. U., Wang, L., Chen, L., Tsang, D. C., Ng, S. T., Poon, C. S., & Mechtcherine, V. (2020). Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong. Environment International, 145, 106139, is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139en_US
dc.subjectConstruction utilizationen_US
dc.subjectContaminated sedimenten_US
dc.subjectGreen remediationen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectStabilization/Solidificationen_US
dc.subjectWaste incineration fly ashen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment : a case study of Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage11-
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139-
dcterms.abstractProper management of hazardous materials arouses widespread environmental concerns due to its enormous ecological and health impacts. The development of green stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology for resourceful utilization of hazardous materials, as well as the immobilization of potentially toxic elements is of great scientific interests. Cement-based S/S is often considered a low-cost and highly efficient technology, but the environmental sustainability of a broad spectrum of S/S technologies has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental sustainability of S/S technologies for managing two common types of hazardous wastes, i.e., contaminated marine sediment and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA) by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 17 scenarios under three strategies for sediment and two strategies for MIFA S/S technologies were comprehensively evaluated. The LCA results identified the most preferable S/S technology in each strategy. In particular, Scenario 1 (mixture of sediment with a small percentage of ordinary Portland cement and incinerated sewage sludge ash) of Strategy 1 (use as fill materials) would be the preferred option, as it reduces about 54% and 70% global warming potential compared to those of Scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. This is the first initiative for evaluating the environmental impacts of a wide range of recently developed S/S technologies using green/alternative binders for diverting hazardous wastes from disposal. The results can serve as a decision support for the practical application of the environmentally friendly S/S technology for sustainable remediation.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnvironmental international, 2020, v. 145, 106139, p. 1-11-
dcterms.isPartOfEnvironmental international-
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091630831-
dc.identifier.pmid32980737-
dc.identifier.artn106139-
dc.description.validate202101 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hossain_Evaluating_environmental_impacts.pdf2.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

198
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

45
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

66
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

51
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.