Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88969
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorSu, Men_US
dc.creatorLuan, Wen_US
dc.creatorFu, Xen_US
dc.creatorYang, Zen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T07:14:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-15T07:14:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn0967-070Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88969-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Su, M., Luan, W., Fu, X., Yang, Z., & Zhang, R. (2020). The competition effects of low-cost carriers and high-speed rail on the Chinese aviation market. Transport Policy, 95, 37-46 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.025.en_US
dc.subjectChinese aviation marketen_US
dc.subjectCompetitionen_US
dc.subjectHigh-Speed railen_US
dc.subjectLow-Cost carriersen_US
dc.subjectProfitabilityen_US
dc.titleThe competition effects of low-cost carriers and high-speed rail on the Chinese aviation marketen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage37en_US
dc.identifier.epage46en_US
dc.identifier.volume95en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.025en_US
dcterms.abstractDespite the fast growth of the Chinese aviation market in recent years, various legacy regulations remain and a few big airlines dominate the domestic market. This study empirically investigates the competition effects of various passenger carriers on leading airlines' profitability and pricing strategy. Our study suggests that different types of carriers, namely low-cost carriers (LCCs), and the high-speed rail (HSR) operator, all bring effective competition to the aviation market by reducing airlines' profitability and prices. HSR services bring much more significant competition than LCCs, especially on short-distance routes below 1000 km. Chinese airline groups' “dual-brand” strategy did not enhance airlines’ profitability. These findings suggest that there can be multiple driving forces to increase the competitiveness of Chinese airlines. Any type of market deregulation could potentially lead to gains in consumer welfare. In addition, much of the market dynamics will be driven by HSR operations beyond the control of aviation regulators. Government authorities should consider coordinating the development of HSR services and new airports, and meanwhile promote competition in all forms.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransport policy, Sept. 2020, v. 95, p. 37-46en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransport policyen_US
dcterms.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086408329-
dc.description.validate202101 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0538-n06-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Su_Competition_Effects_Low-cost.pdfPre-Published version1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

102
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

172
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.