Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88943
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorJiang, Cen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Sen_US
dc.creatorNg, AKYen_US
dc.creatorGe, YEen_US
dc.creatorFu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T07:14:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-15T07:14:15Z-
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88943-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Jiang, C., Zheng, S., Ng, A. K. Y., Ge, Y.-E., & Fu, X. (2020). The climate change strategies of seaports: Mitigation vs. adaptation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89, 102603 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102603.en_US
dc.subjectClimate change adaptationen_US
dc.subjectClimate change mitigationen_US
dc.subjectSeaporten_US
dc.subjectStrategic complementen_US
dc.subjectStrategic substituteen_US
dc.titleThe climate change strategies of seaports : mitigation vs. adaptationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2020.102603en_US
dcterms.abstractThe two major approaches that seaport operators adopt to address climate change impacts are mitigation (CCM), i.e., reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and adaptation (CCA), i.e., adjusting the facility to moderate the negative outcomes of climate change. This paper is among the first to construct an economic model to compare the impacts of CCM and CCA in affecting the outputs of the executing port and the other ports in its network, considering the effects of market interactions. We find that both strategies can increase the executing port's cargo traffic, and can either increase or decrease the other port's cargo traffic depending on the market relationships between the ports. We also implement a numerical case study on four Chinese ports (Ports of Shenzhen, Xiamen, Tianjin and Hong Kong) based on our model.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, Dec. 2020, v. 89, 102603en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part D, Transport and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095700116-
dc.identifier.artn102603en_US
dc.description.validate202101 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0538-n02-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jiang_Climate_Change_Strategies.pdfPre-Published version1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

110
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

200
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.