Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorChan, WLSen_US
dc.creatorPin, TWen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.titleReliability, validity and minimal detectable change of 2-minute walk test, 6-minute walk test and 10-meter walk test in frail older adultsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.abstractBackground:Walk tests are frequently used in evaluating frail older adults with multi-morbidities but their psychometric properties in this population are unclear. This study aimed at determining test-retest and inter-rater reliability, construct and known-group validity, and minimal detectable change at 95% level of confidence (MDC95) of walk tests in frail older adults.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: In this cross-sectional psychometric study with repeated measures, a convenient sample of older adults who were frail and able to walk independently for at least 15 metres were recruited from day care and residential care facilities. All participants completed a 2-minute walk test (2MWT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 10-metre walk test (10MeWT) on six separate occasions over a 2-week period under two independent examiners. Functional status was measured using the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI). Health-related quality of life was measured with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).en_US
dcterms.abstractResult: Forty-four frail older adults were examined. Excellent test-rest (ICC=0.95-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.91-0.97) were shown in all the walk tests. Good to strong correlations were found between the walk tests and the EMS (r=0.53-0.57), BBS (r=0.59-0.66) and MBI (r=0.55-0.59). The correlations between the walk tests and the SF-12 were generally weak (r=0.05-0.30). All the walk tests were able to distinguish between those who used no walking aid and quadripod or walking frame (p≤0.004), and those who could walk outdoor and indoor only (p≤0.002). The MDC95 were 7.7m in the 2MWT, 24.7m in the 6MWT, and 0.13m/s in the 10MeWT.en_US
dcterms.abstractDiscussion: The 2MWT, 6MWT and 10MeWT are reliable and valid measures in evaluating the walking performance of frail older adults. The MDC95 of the walk tests has been recommended for this population group.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation11th International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Asia/Oceania Regional Congress 2019, 23-27 Oct 2019, Taipei, Taiwan (Abstract)en_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG) Asia/Oceania Regional Congressen_US
dc.description.validate202011 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaOther Versionen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract_IAGG2019.pdf720.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Other Version
Show simple item record

Page views

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Sep 24, 2023


Citations as of Sep 24, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.