Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88359
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorPolitzer-Ahles, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T01:02:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-29T01:02:40Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88359-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Language and Linguistics Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Politzer‐Ahles, S. (2020). What can electrophysiology tell us about the cognitive processing of scalar implicatures?. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(10), 1-22, is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12401en_US
dc.titleWhat can electrophysiology tell us about the cognitive processing of scalar implicatures?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage22en_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/lnc3.12401en_US
dcterms.abstractOne of the most widely studied phenomena in neuropragmatics—the study of how the brain derives context- and speaker-based aspects of meaning—is scalar implicature. A scalar implicature is the interpretation of a proposition like Some of the students failed as meaning that a stronger proposition (Not all of the students failed) is not true. While scalar implicatures have been a significant object of study for decades, in recent years there has been an explosion of experiments investigating them using neuroscientific methods, particularly electroencephalography. Much of this research aims to identify neural substrates of comprehending scalar implicatures. Here, I review the extant findings and argue that the most of these studies have not directly observed neural correlates of scalar implicatures; rather, they have mostly observed downstream and/or domain-general processes that happen to be related to implicatures, but not uniquely so. I argue that an instrumental approach to neuroscience—one that treats brain components not as objects of research in of themselves, but as tools for learning about pragmatics—would be a valuable addition to this emerging field.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLanguage and linguistics compass, 2020, v. 14, no. 10, p. 1-22en_US
dcterms.isPartOfLanguage and linguistics compassen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089869283-
dc.identifier.eissn1749-818Xen_US
dc.description.validate202010 bcma-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PolitzerAhles_What_can_electrophysiology.pdf524.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

57
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

33
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.