Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88327
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorYoung, Aen_US
dc.creatorSwain, MSen_US
dc.creatorKawchuk, GNen_US
dc.creatorWong, AYLen_US
dc.creatorDownie, ASen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T01:02:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-29T01:02:27Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88327-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Young, A., Swain, M.S., Kawchuk, G.N. et al. The bench-top accuracy of the VerteTrack spinal stiffness assessment device. Chiropr Man Therap 28, 42 (2020), is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00331-8en_US
dc.subjectMechanical spinal stiffness deviceen_US
dc.subjectSpinal stiffnessen_US
dc.subjectSpinal stiffness assessmenten_US
dc.subjectVerteTrack and instrumented spinal stiffness measurementsen_US
dc.titleThe bench-top accuracy of the VerteTrack spinal stiffness assessment deviceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage9en_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12998-020-00331-8en_US
dcterms.abstractBACKGROUND: The assessment of spinal stiffness by manual palpation in clinical settings has demonstrated both poor accuracy and reliability. More recently, mechanical methods for assessment of spinal stiffness have demonstrated superior accuracy and reliability. However, mechanical methods of spinal stiffness assessment can be expensive, time consuming and/or unsuited to clinical practice. While a new device has been designed to address these issues (VerteTrack), its benchtop performance remains unknown.en_US
dcterms.abstractAIM: To measure the bench-top performance of VerteTrack.en_US
dcterms.abstractMETHODS: A series of laboratory-based experiments were conducted in February 2018 to investigate the accuracy (precision and bias) of load and displacement measurements obtained by VerteTrack and then were compared against an appropriate reference standard. Measurements of both multiple-level continuous assessment (multiple spinal levels measured), and single-level assessment (single spinal level measured) were performed on a viscoelastic foam medium (AIREX® balance beam, Switzerland) and the resulting stiffness calculated.en_US
dcterms.abstractRESULTS: VerteTrack demonstrated high precision at all loads and displacements. There was minimal systematic measurement bias identified for applied versus reference load (mean bias = - 0.123 N; 95%CI - 0.182 to 0.428 N, p < .001), and no systematic measurement bias for measured versus reference displacement (mean difference = 0.02 mm; 95%CI - 0.09 to 0.14 mm, p < .001). The magnitude of stiffness obtained during multiple-level continuous assessment was on average 0.25 N/mm (2.79%) less than that for single-level assessment (95%CI - 0.67 to 0.17 N/mm, p < .001).en_US
dcterms.abstractCONCLUSIONS: VerteTrack demonstrated high accuracy (high precision, low bias) under bench-top conditions. The difference in stiffness found between multiple versus single spinal levels should be considered in the research context, but is unlikely to be clinically relevant. The results of this study demonstrate that VerteTrack may be suitable for both single and multi-level spinal stiffness measurements in-vivo.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChiropractic and manual therapies, 2020, v. 28, no. 1, 42, p. 1-9en_US
dcterms.isPartOfChiropractic and manual therapiesen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089630544-
dc.identifier.pmid32807186-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-709Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn42en_US
dc.description.validate202010 bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0829-n18, OA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID1909-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Young_bench-top_accuracy.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

59
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

22
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.