Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88271
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informaticsen_US
dc.creatorZhuge, Cen_US
dc.creatorShao, Cen_US
dc.creatorLi, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T02:42:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-20T02:42:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88271-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhuge, C.; Shao, C.; Li, X. A Comparative Study of En Route Refuelling Behaviours of Conventional and Electric Vehicles in Beijing, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3869 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11143869en_US
dc.subjectBattery electric vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectCharging behaviouren_US
dc.subjectMultinomial logit (MNL) modelen_US
dc.subjectPlug-in hybrid electric vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectRefuelling behaviouren_US
dc.titleA comparative study of en route refuelling behaviours of conventional and electric vehicles in Beijing, Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage21en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su11143869en_US
dcterms.abstractA comparative study is carried out to investigate the differences among conventional vehicles (CVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) in the maximum acceptable time of diverting to a refuelling station, maximum acceptable time of queueing at a refuelling station, refuelling modes and desirable electric driving ranges, using Beijing, China, as a case study. Here, several multinomial logit (MNL) models are developed to relate the diverting and waiting times to individual attributes. The results suggest that, (1) the diverting time roughly follows a normal distribution for both CVs and electric vehicles (EVs), but the difference between them is slight; (2) EVs tend to bear longer waiting time above 10 min; (3) the MNL models indicate that income and the level of education tend to be more statistically significant to both the diverting and waiting times; (4) the most preferred driving ranges obtained for BEVs and PHEVs are both around 50 km, indicating that EV drivers may just prefer to charge for a specific time ranging from 8 to 10 min. Finally, ways to apply the empirical findings in planning refuelling and charging stations are discussed with specific examples.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, 2 July 2019, v. 11, no. 14, 3869, p. 1-21en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainabilityen_US
dcterms.issued2019-07-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070681660-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050en_US
dc.identifier.artn3869en_US
dc.description.validate202010 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Othersen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhuge_En_Route_Refuelling.pdf4.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

28
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.