Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88099
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorLee, JG-
dc.creatorSeo, J-
dc.creatorAbbas, A-
dc.creatorChoi, M-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T02:12:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-18T02:12:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88099-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lee, J.G.; Seo, J.; Abbas, A.; Choi, M. End-Users’ Augmented Reality Utilization for Architectural Design Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5363 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10155363en_US
dc.subjectAugmented realityen_US
dc.subjectVirtual realityen_US
dc.subject3D building modelen_US
dc.subjectDesign reviewen_US
dc.titleEnd-users' augmented reality utilization for architectural design reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage15-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app10155363-
dcterms.abstractTo effectively use augmented reality (AR) technology for end-user involved design collaboration, it is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the AR system from the end-user's perspective. However, most efforts have mainly focused on technological development, and as such, limited attention has been paid to the end-user's application of the AR system. Therefore, this study investigates how the AR system affects architectural design review based on the user's perspectives. Three different display systems presenting a 3D model including a 2D screen, VR, and AR were tested, and a total of 76 participants evaluated visual presentation quality, perceived acceptability, and user experience according to their usage of the visualization platform types during the design review activities. Compared to other systems, the results indicated that the AR system could be more effective in reviewing the visual elements of a building. Furthermore, AR showed the highest ratings for acceptance level and user experience. The innovation provided by AR created a positive user experience, despite its remaining challenges to be resolved in terms of functionality. Since it is expected that the use of AR can be promoted by overcoming certain technological limitations, this study contributes to guiding AR system applications for end-users involved in the design review process.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied sciences, 1 Aug. 2020, v. 10, no. 15, 5363, p. 1-15-
dcterms.isPartOfApplied sciences-
dcterms.issued2020-08-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000559368300001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089900638-
dc.identifier.artn5363-
dc.description.validate202009 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lee_End-Users_Augmented_Reality.pdf2.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

95
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

101
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.