Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/87981
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Management-
dc.creatorZhong, L-
dc.creatorLi, X-
dc.creatorLaw, R-
dc.creatorSun, S-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T00:53:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-04T00:53:24Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/87981-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhong L, Li X, Law R, Sun S. Developing Sustainable Urbanization Index: Case of China. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4585, is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114585en_US
dc.subjectDevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectEntropy methoden_US
dc.subjectIndex systemen_US
dc.subjectMulti-channel urbanization qualityen_US
dc.subjectSustainable urbanization approachen_US
dc.titleDeveloping sustainable urbanization index : case of Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12114585-
dcterms.abstractUrbanization in China is considered an important force for global sustainable development. In particular, China's urbanization is of great significance to achieve the Millennium Goals of the UN. Hence, an in-depth understanding of China's urbanization sustainable development process and model of sustainable development is urgently needed. As a result, this study examines the sustainable development of urbanization using China as an example through a survey method. Specifically, sustainable development of urbanization is examined from the following five perspectives: economic development, basic public service quality, ecological environment development, urban-rural heterogeneity, and population urbanization. Differences in the sustainable development quality of different urbanization models and regional urbanization were analyzed. Findings showed that the difference in urbanization quality between different models is not obvious, while the difference in urbanization quality between regions is more obvious. Furthermore, the quality of urbanization development in the eastern region is better than that in the central and western regions, and the level of urbanization development with high administrative levels is superior to regions with low administrative levels.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, 2020, v. 12, no. 11, 4585-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainability-
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086369730-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.artn4585-
dc.description.validate202009 bcma-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhong_Developing_sustainable_urbanization.pdf691.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

178
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

46
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.