Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorLin, CY-
dc.creatorCheung, MKT-
dc.creatorHung, ATF-
dc.creatorPoon, PKK-
dc.creatorChan, SCC-
dc.creatorChan, CCH-
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2020. Article reuse guidelines:
dc.rightsCreative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (
dc.rightsThe following publication Lin, C.-Y., Cheung, M. K. T., Hung, A. T. F., Poon, P. K. K., Chan, S. C. C., & Chan, C. C. H. (2020). Can a modified theory of planned behavior explain the effects of empowerment education for people with type 2 diabetes? Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 11, 1-12 is available at
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.subjectTheory of planned behavioren_US
dc.subjectType 2 diabetesen_US
dc.titleCan a modified theory of planned behavior explain the effects of empowerment education for people with type 2 diabetes?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: The effectiveness of the Patient Empowerment Program (PEP) has been demonstrated in people with diabetes mellitus (DM); however, the underlying reasons for its effectiveness remain unclear. To improve effectiveness, we need to study the psychological mechanism(s) of PEP to understand why it is effective. This study hypothesized that the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), modified specifically for people with DM, could describe the mechanism explaining PEP effects.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: A longitudinal design was used. Patients with type 2 DM (n = 365; 151 males; mean age = 62.9 +/- 9.6 years) received two education sessions (i.e. seminars delivered by registered nurses to provide disease-specific knowledge), and some (n = 210) further enrolled afterwards in five empowerment sessions (i.e. small-group interactive workshops conducted by social workers to practice action planning, problem solving, and experience sharing). Validated questionnaires were used to measure risk perception, health literacy, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention on diabetes self-care behaviors, and four diabetes self-care behaviors (diet control, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care) at baseline. Three months later (i.e. at the end of PEP), all participants completed the behavioral intention and diabetes self-care behaviors measures again. Attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, behavioral intention, and diabetes self-care behaviors were assessed to represent the TPB constructs. Risk perception and health literacy elements relevant to people with DM were assessed and added to modify the TPB.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The behavioral intention was associated with three diabetes self-care behaviors: exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care. The behavioral intention was found to be a significant mediator in the following relationships: empowerment session participation and exercise (beta = 0.045, p = 0.04), and empowerment session participation and foot care (beta = 0.099, p < 0.001).-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The effects of enrollment of empowerment sessions in PEP on exercise and foot care were likely to be mediated through behavioral intention.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2020, v. 11, p. 1-12-
dcterms.isPartOfTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism-
dc.description.validate202006 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lin_Modified_Theory_Behavior.pdf306.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

Citations as of Jul 3, 2022


Citations as of Jul 3, 2022


Citations as of Jun 30, 2022


Citations as of Jun 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.