Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81648
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorHo, LYW-
dc.creatorChin, KCW-
dc.creatorFung, CYY-
dc.creatorLai, CKY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T12:28:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-10T12:28:24Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/81648-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ho, L. Y. W., Chin, K. C. W., Fung, C. Y. Y., & Lai, C. K. Y. (2020). Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability. Nursing Open, 7(1), 390-397 is available at https://dx.doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398en_US
dc.subjectHorticultural therapyen_US
dc.subjectInstrument developmenten_US
dc.subjectInstrument responsivenessen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual disabilityen_US
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_US
dc.subjectReliability and validityen_US
dc.titleValidation of the Chinese non-pharmacological therapy experience scale in persons with intellectual disabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage390en_US
dc.identifier.epage397en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nop2.398en_US
dcterms.abstractAim: To validate the 4- and 7-point Chinese Non-pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability.-
dcterms.abstractDesign: A validation study.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: Sixty-seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4-point and 7-point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The Cronbach's alpha of the 4- and 7-point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter-rater reliability of the 4- and 7-point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7-point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4-point scale.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNursing open, Jan. 2019, v. 7, no. 1, p. 390-397-
dcterms.isPartOfNursing open-
dcterms.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000490113000001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074363664-
dc.identifier.eissn2054-1058en_US
dc.description.validate202002 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Validation_Chinese_Non-pharmacological.pdf411.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

144
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

81
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.