Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80008
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorKhoshbakht, M-
dc.creatorGou, Z-
dc.creatorXie, X-
dc.creatorHe, B-
dc.creatorDarko, A-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:14:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:14:37Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/80008-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z., Xie, X., He, B., & Darko, A. (2018). Green building occupant satisfaction: Evidence from the australian higher education sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 2890, 1-21 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10082890en_US
dc.subjectBuilding designen_US
dc.subjectFacilities managementen_US
dc.subjectGreen buildingen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectIndoor environment qualityen_US
dc.subjectOccupant satisfactionen_US
dc.titleGreen building occupant satisfaction : evidence from the Australian higher education sectoren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage21-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su10082890-
dcterms.abstractUniversities spend billions of dollars on green buildings as a sustainability commitment. This research investigates occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ), building design (BD), and facilities management (FM) in five highly ranked green higher educational buildings in the subtropical climate of Australia, in comparison to nine non-green counterparts. The results disclose that the green building users were more consistently satisfied than the non-green building users with BD & FM elements, such as design, needs from facilities, building image, cleaning, the availability of meeting rooms, and storage. On the other hand, the study revealed weaknesses of green buildings in IEQ, such as noise, ventilation, and artificial lighting. The individual environmental control positively correlated with satisfaction in non-green buildings, but did not significantly affect satisfaction in green buildings. This study also identified the influences of non-environmental factors on occupant satisfaction, such as gender, age, sitting close to a window, hours spent in the building and in the workstation, and the number of people sharing office space. The research provides evidence and guidance for investing in, designing, and managing green educational facilities.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, 2018, v. 10, no. 8, 2890, p. 1-21-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainability-
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85051650422-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.artn2890-
dc.description.validate201812 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Khoshbakht_Green_Occupant_Satisfaction.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

187
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

Downloads

165
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jul 3, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.