Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79796
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorChan, ACMen_US
dc.creatorOuyang, XHen_US
dc.creatorJehu, DAMen_US
dc.creatorChung, RCKen_US
dc.creatorPang, MYCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:13:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:13:25Z-
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/79796-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chan, A. C., Ouyang, X. H., Jehu, D. A., Chung, R. C., & Pang, M. Y. (2018). Recovery of balance function among individuals with total knee arthroplasty: comparison of responsiveness among four balance tests. Gait & posture, 59, 267-271 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.020en_US
dc.subjectBalanceen_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.titleRecovery of balance function among individuals with total knee arthroplasty : comparison of responsiveness among four balance testsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage267en_US
dc.identifier.epage271en_US
dc.identifier.volume59en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.020en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground and aim: Balance deficits are common after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however the responsiveness of commonly used balance measurement tools has not been well defined. The objective of this prospective study was to compare the internal and external responsiveness of four measurement tools in assessing recovery of balance function following TKA.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: A total of 134 individuals with TKA (95 women; age: 66.3 +/- 6.6 years) completed the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post-TKA. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) served as the anchor measure, and was also measured across these time points. Internal responsiveness was indicated by the standardized response mean (SRM), while external responsiveness was reflected by the degree of association of the changes of balance scores with those of FGA.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The SRM ranged from 0.60-1.14 for the BESTest, 0.40-0.94 for the Mini-BESTest, 0.27-0.91 for the Brief-BESTest, and 0.19-0.70 for the BBS, over time. The change in BESTest and Mini-BESTest scores predicted the change in the FGA scores across all time periods, except for the Mini-BESTest between weeks 12-24, accounting for 13-27%, and 12-24% of the variance, respectively. The Brief-BESTest scores only predicted FGA scores between the weeks 2-4 (R-2 = 20%). The changes in BBS scores were not associated with the FGA.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The BESTest is the most responsive in measuring recovery of balance among individuals with TKA. The Mini-BESTest is a reasonable option during time constraints.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGait and posture, Jan. 2018, v. 59, p. 267-271en_US
dcterms.isPartOfGait and postureen_US
dcterms.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000415235300047-
dc.identifier.pmid29121594-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2219en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017000796-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate201812 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0590-n22-
dc.identifier.SubFormID346-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

56
Citations as of Jun 26, 2022

Downloads

81
Citations as of Jun 26, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jun 23, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jun 23, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.