Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/78604
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWan, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Aen_US
dc.creatorLi, KXen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T01:17:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-28T01:17:03Z-
dc.identifier.issn0308-8839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/78604-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Maritime Policy and Management on 16 Nov. 2017 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053en_US
dc.subjectPort competitionen_US
dc.subjectHinterland accessibilityen_US
dc.subjectGame theoretic approachen_US
dc.subjectStrategic investmenten_US
dc.subjectEmpiricsen_US
dc.titlePort competition with accessibility and congestion : a theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage239en_US
dc.identifier.epage259en_US
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053en_US
dcterms.abstractThis review interprets recent studies of the interactions between the competition of gateway seaports and the accessibility of landside transportation links to inland regions. Port competition is treated as part of a rivalry between two transportation chains. This article identifies the main modeling approaches and defines the different types of hinterland access systems described in the literature. A general theoretical framework is then proposed to incorporate those key components. The importance of the proposed framework is revealed by comparing and extending results from the literature. Major assumptions that need further empirical verification are identified and discussed, and related empirical studies are reviewed. Finally, avenues for further research are discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaritime policy and management, 2018, v. 45, no. 2, p. 239-259en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMaritime policy and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000424062200006-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5254en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017005130-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate201809 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0335-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextSocial Science and Humanities Research Council of Canadaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6983909-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wan_Port_Competition_Accessibility.pdfPre-Published version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

104
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023

Downloads

67
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
Citations as of Sep 28, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Sep 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.