Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/78097
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketing-
dc.creatorOuyang, K-
dc.creatorXu, E-
dc.creatorHuang, X-
dc.creatorLiu, W-
dc.creatorTang, YP-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:39:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:39:26Z-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/78097-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.rights©American Psychological Association, 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000288-
dc.rightsThe following publication Ouyang, K., Xu, E., Huang, X., Liu, W., & Tang, Y. (2018). Reaching the limits of reciprocity in favor exchange: The effects of generous, stingy, and matched favor giving on social status. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 614-630 is available at https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000288-
dc.subjectGenerous/stingy favor givingen_US
dc.subjectMatched favor givingen_US
dc.subjectGratitudeen_US
dc.subjectPerceived competenceen_US
dc.subjectSocial statusen_US
dc.titleReaching the limits of reciprocity in favor exchange : the effects of generous, stingy, and matched favor giving on social statusen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage614en_US
dc.identifier.epage630en_US
dc.identifier.volume103en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/apl0000288en_US
dcterms.abstractGroup members gain social status via giving favors to others, but why and when they do so remain unclear in the literature. Building on social exchange theory and social status literature, we identify three types of favor giving among group members (generous, stingy, and matched) and propose that an affective mechanism (i.e., gratitude) and a cognitive mechanism (i.e., perceived competence) underlie the relationship between favor giving and status attainment. Specifically, generous/stingy favor giving has a linear relationship with status attainment through both gratitude and perceived competence, whereas matched favor giving has a curvilinear relationship with status attainment only through perceived competence. An experimental study and a field study lend support to our propositions. Our study complements the literature by offering a complete picture of how three types of favor giving among group members shape their social status in different ways.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of applied psychology, June 2018, v. 103, no. 6, p. 614-630-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of applied psychology-
dcterms.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.eissn1939-1854en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017001044-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.validate201809 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0257-n01en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ouyang_Limits_Reciprocity_Exchange.pdfPre-Published version1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

278
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023

Downloads

1,080
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
Citations as of Sep 28, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

27
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.