Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7035
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | en_US |
dc.creator | Wong, SS | en_US |
dc.creator | Fong, NKK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:26:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:26:05Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1041-6102 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7035 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press published on behalf of the International Psychogeriatric Association | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2009 International Psychogeriatric Association | en_US |
dc.rights | The following article "Shui Sang Wong and Kenneth Nai Kuen Fong (2009). Reliability and validity of the telephone version of the Cantonese Mini-mental State Examination (T-CMMSE) when used with elderly patients with and without dementia in Hong Kong. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(2), pp 345-353. doi:10.1017/S1041610209008588." is available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=5000380 | en_US |
dc.subject | CMMSE | en_US |
dc.subject | Telephone CMMSE | en_US |
dc.subject | Dementia | en_US |
dc.subject | Telephone follow-up | en_US |
dc.title | Reliability and validity of the telephone version of the Cantonese Mini-mental State Examination (T-CMMSE) when used with elderly patients with and without dementia in Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this publication: Kenneth Nai Kuen Fong | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 345 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 353 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1041610209008588 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Background: The objectives of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of a 26-point telephone version of the Cantonese Mini-mental State Examination (T-CMMSE) for a sample of 65 elderly patients, comprising 31 patients without dementia and 34 patients with dementia, in an acute regional hospital in Hong Kong, and to identify an optimal cut-off score to discriminate between those patients with dementia and those without. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Methods: Participants were rated by using the face-to-face Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) before inpatient discharge and the T-CMMSE after inpatient discharge, and were rated separately by two raters in two telephone follow-up sessions using the T-CMMSE. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Results: The results of the study indicated that the scale had excellent inter-and intra-rater reliabilities. There was substantial agreement between the two versions of the examination (κ > 0.6–0.8 ≤) for orientation, registration, and recall items. An optimal cut-off score of ≤ 16 was suggested for the T-CMMSE to discriminate between those with and without dementia. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Conclusion: The T-CMMSE can be used in telephone follow-ups as an alternative to the conventional face-to-face version. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | International Psychogeriatrics, Apr. 2009, v. 21, no. 2, p. 345-353 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | International Psychogeriatrics | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2009-04 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000264911000016 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-65649147547 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19243663 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r42831 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2008-2009 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0729-n51 | - |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 1275 | - |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | VoR allowed | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wong_T-CMMSE_Elderly_Dementia.pdf | 166.28 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
286
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
660
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
15
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of May 8, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
14
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.