Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68566
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
dc.creator | Yu, T | en_US |
dc.creator | Shen, GQ | en_US |
dc.creator | Shi, Q | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-29T01:46:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-29T01:46:06Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-9364 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68566 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright 2017 by the American Society of Civil Engineers This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of construction engineering and management . The open URL of the article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262 | en_US |
dc.subject | Design-bid-build | en_US |
dc.subject | Design-build | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic theories | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance quality | en_US |
dc.subject | Project profits | en_US |
dc.subject | Quality-profit equilibrium points | en_US |
dc.subject | Contracting | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing the performance quality of design-bid-build and design-build delivery methods | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | The choice of delivery method is one of the most important decisions that can determine the quality of construction projects. Two basic delivery methods, design-bid-build and design-build, have been compared in terms of project quality; however, an important quality dimension, performance quality, has generally been ignored in previous studies. In this study, the authors used existing economic theories to develop a model to examine the performance quality and project profits of these two delivery methods. The equilibrium points of the model were analyzed with consideration given to influencing factors such as cost coefficient, cooperation efficiency, and coordination cost. Four propositions were made to facilitate the quality-profit comparisons between design-bid-build and design-build. The first proposition showed that to maximize personal profit, the project coordinator should always keep a balance between design quality and construction quality, regardless of the delivery method. The other three propositions indicated that both methods can generate relatively higher levels of performance quality and project profits in an appropriate project environment. Based on these propositions, the authors ranked the performance quality and profits of the two methods within different conditions and used a real project to exhibit the practical value of these findings. Via case study, cooperation efficiency was identified as the most critical factor that determines the selection of delivery method. In addition, three key steps were summarized to facilitate the application of the model developed in this study. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of construction engineering and management, Apr. 2017, v. 143, no. 4, 04016111, p. 1-10 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of construction engineering and management | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2017-04 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000398514000015 | - |
dc.identifier.ros | 2016002631 | - |
dc.source.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1943-7862 | en_US |
dc.identifier.artn | 04016111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | 2016002575 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 201804_a bcma | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0135-n11 | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yu_Tao_2016_r.pdf | Pre-published version | 565.93 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
456
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024
Downloads
579
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
21
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Aug 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
14
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.