Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6821
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics-
dc.creatorLee, WCC-
dc.creatorLee, CKL-
dc.creatorLeung, AKL-
dc.creatorHutchins, SW-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:26:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:26:26Z-
dc.identifier.issn0748-7711-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/6821-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Serviceen_US
dc.rightsThe article is available at http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/2012/493/abslee493.htmlen_US
dc.subjectAlignmenten_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAMen_US
dc.subjectCastingen_US
dc.subjectDigital scanningen_US
dc.subjectFoot impressionen_US
dc.subjectFoot orthosisen_US
dc.subjectFoot shapeen_US
dc.subjectInsoleen_US
dc.subjectNon-weight-bearingen_US
dc.subjectSubtalar jointen_US
dc.titleIs it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage459-
dc.identifier.epage466-
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049-
dcterms.abstractWhen taking molds for foot orthoses, it is accepted practice to position the subtalar joint in its neutral position. However, foot orthoses have no contact with the talus, and this leads to a hypothesis that as long as there is correction available to appropriately align the forefoot relative to the hindfoot when taking a mold, changes in subtalar joint angles do not lead to significant alterations in the plantar surface shapes of the molds taken. This study tested this presumption with 20 subjects between 22 and 46 years old. During non–weight-bearing casting, the subtalar joints were aligned at positions of 4° of eversion, 2° of eversion, 2° of inversion, and in neutral. At each orientation, forces were applied over the forefoot such that the metatarsal heads were aligned with the rearfoot. Digital scanning was used to analyze the shape of each negative mold. There were significant changes in projection volume in different subtalar joint orientations. However, the changes in arch heights, navicular height, and protrusion were insignificant and very small. It is therefore suggested that as long as the forefoot and hindfoot are appropriately aligned, variations in the orientation of the subtalar joint would be acceptable.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of rehabilitation research and development, 2012, v. 49, no. 3, p. 459-466-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of rehabilitation research and development-
dcterms.issued2012-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000319302600013-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866437505-
dc.identifier.pmid22773204-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr59168-
dc.description.ros2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lee_Foot_Subtalar_Joint.pdf490.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

167
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

114
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.