Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6754
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | - |
| dc.creator | Wang, XJ | - |
| dc.creator | Zhou, XQ | - |
| dc.creator | Xia, Y | - |
| dc.creator | Weng, S | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:23:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:23:05Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1369-4332 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6754 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Multi-Science | en_US |
| dc.rights | © Multi-Science Publishing | en_US |
| dc.rights | Posted with permission of the publisher. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Damage identification | en_US |
| dc.subject | Modal parameters | en_US |
| dc.subject | Modal flexibility | en_US |
| dc.subject | Uncertainty | en_US |
| dc.subject | Statistical model updating | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparisons between Modal-Parameter-Based and Flexibility-Based Damage Identification Methods | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this publication: Y. Xia | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1611 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1620 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 16 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1260/1369-4332.16.9.1611 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Modal parameters and modal flexibility obtained from the modal experiment have been used for damage identification in frequency domain. These two methods are compared in this paper numerically and experimentally. The optimization objective function of the former method is a weighted function of the frequency and mode shape residues, in which different weights can be assigned to the frequencies and mode shapes so that their degrees of accuracy can be taken into account. The optimization objective function of the latter method is the modal flexibility residue. Based on the same modal data, the two methods are compared from different aspects, including the damage configurations and uncertainties in the modal data. Results show that using the modal parameters directly can detect damage more accurately and reliably than using the modal flexibility. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Advances in structural engineering, Sept. 2013, v. 16, no. 9, p. 1611-1620 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Advances in structural engineering | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2013-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000325601200013 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84885932302 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2048-4011 | - |
| dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r71185 | - |
| dc.description.ros | 2013-2014 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Publisher permission | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASE13-16-09-1611_ISSE.pdf | 391.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
176
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
252
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
17
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
17
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



