Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6670
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies | - |
| dc.creator | Li, D | - |
| dc.creator | Wang, W | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:25:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:25:07Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1000-0429 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6670 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh | en_US |
| dc.publisher | 外语敎学与硏究出版社 | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2011 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。 | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research use. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Think-aloud protocols | en_US |
| dc.subject | Interpreting | en_US |
| dc.title | 关于有声思维法口译研究 | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.description.otherinformation | Title in Traditional Chinese: 關於有聲思維法口譯研究 | en_US |
| dc.description.otherinformation | Journal title in Traditional Chinese: 外語教學與研究 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 900 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 910 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | 本文回顾过去二十余年来口译研究中运用有声思维法的发展历程，总结并介绍有声思维口译研究在口译过程、口译策略及口译质量方面所取得的进展。随后，在参考 Lincoln & Guba(1985)提出的自然主义研究信度衡量标准的基础上，制订出了有声思维口译研究的量尺，并以此来考察9篇相关文献的总体研究设计，发现这些研究在信度与效度方面都存在不少不足。本文亦对将来的有声思维口译研究如何确保信度和效度方面提出了建议。 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | The paper reviews the major studies of the past two decades that have applied think-aloud protocols(TAPs) to the study of interpreting. It summarizes TAPs development in the process, strategy and quality of interpreting. Drawing on the safeguards for the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries proposed by Lincoln & Guba(1985) ,the paper specifies a set of criteria which are then used to evaluate the research designs of nine interpreting studies that adopted TAPs as their research method.It is shown that most of the surveyed studies did not meet these criteria. The paper concludes by giving suggestions on how to ensure the reliability and validity of future TAPs interpreting research. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.alternative | Think-aloud protocols and interpreting research : a critical review | - |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | 外语教学与研究 (Foreign language teaching and research), Nov. 2011, v. 43, no. 6, p. 900-910, 960-961 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | 外语教学与研究 (Foreign language teaching and research) | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2011-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r61296 | - |
| dc.description.ros | 2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li_Think-aloud_Protocols_Interpreting.pdf | 551.68 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks 
Page views
273
Last Week
2
2
Last month
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023
Downloads
186
Citations as of Oct 1, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.