Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65601
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | - |
dc.creator | Chan, MHM | - |
dc.creator | Keung, DTF | - |
dc.creator | Lui, SYT | - |
dc.creator | Cheung, RTH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-22T02:08:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-22T02:08:54Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1013-7025 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65601 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2016, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Chan, M. H., Keung, D. T., Lui, S. Y., & Cheung, R. T. (2016). A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 35, 1-4 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001 | en_US |
dc.subject | Aging | en_US |
dc.subject | Five-time sit-to-stand | en_US |
dc.subject | Geriatric assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical examination | en_US |
dc.subject | Timed up-and-go | en_US |
dc.title | A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Background To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests. | - |
dcterms.abstract | Objective This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition. Methods Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods. | - |
dcterms.abstract | Results The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC(2,1) = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC(2,1) = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test. | - |
dcterms.abstract | Conclusion We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hong Kong physiotherapy journal, 2016, v. 35, p. 1-4 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Hong Kong physiotherapy journal | - |
dcterms.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000390053100002 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84999622367 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1876-441X | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 201812_a bcma | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chan_validation_study_smartphone.pdf | 360.52 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
137
Last Week
1
1
Last month
6
6
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024
Downloads
106
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.