Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/64780
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorYan, Hen_US
dc.creatorChen, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T07:02:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-24T07:02:41Z-
dc.identifier.issn1004-2938en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/64780-
dc.language.isozhen_US
dc.publisher中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社en_US
dc.rights©2015 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。en_US
dc.rights©2015 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research purposes.en_US
dc.subjectFake cooperativeen_US
dc.subjectRural differentiationen_US
dc.subjectLiang Shumingen_US
dc.titleThe cooperative campaign in rural areas and the third path : debate and reflectionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage180en_US
dc.identifier.epage200en_US
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dcterms.abstractA cooperative campaign is now in full momentum in China. There are a lot of controversies going on behind it. Some suggest that we should instead promote specialized cooperatives among the farmers. Some dismiss the majority of the mushrooming cooperatives as"fake."Some propose to take the comprehensive farming associations in Japan,South Korea and Taiwan as our models. These controversies are not just relevant to the agricultural cooperative,they bear upon the debate over China’s path of development. In 1930 s,an agricultural cooperative campaign was also prevalent in China,which was accompanied by furious debates among the intellectuals over China’s future. This paper brings the views and arguments of the intellectuals in these two periods concerning the development of rural cooperative into comparison. We find that the two cooperative campaigns bear similarity with each other in terms of social cognition,judgement of social nature,and the appeal for social reform. We also find that both campaigns are faced with structural predicament. As Chinese rural areas are undergoing rapid transformation,a review of the debate in 1930 s will give us inspiration in addressing current issues.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.alternative农村合作社运动和第三条道路:争论与反思en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation开放时代 (Open times), 2015, v. 2, p. 180-200en_US
dcterms.isPartOf开放时代 (Open times)en_US
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2014001664-
dc.description.ros2014-2015 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRA-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014001664.pdf2.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

133
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

801
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.