Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6443
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorMau, SD-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0267-2359-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/6443-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwellen_US
dc.rights© 2014 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributorsen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectInternational arbitrationen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory reformen_US
dc.titleThe proposed new arbitration law of Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage379-
dc.identifier.epage396-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dcterms.abstractA substantial contributor to Hong Kong's economy is its construction industry. Likewise, with the expansion of the China market, the Mainland's construction activities have resulted in explosive growth in the construction industry. Commensurate with its importance in both economies, construction is also a major source of disputes. As a stakeholder in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, the construction industry tends towards arbitration, which is acceptable to both Hong Kong/Mainland and foreign parties in the event of a dispute arising between these parties. Arbitration in Hong Kong has been touted as a feasible alternative to litigation. Hong Kong has had effective legislation regulating arbitrations conducted in the territory for several decades. The Arbitration Ordinance is about to be amended. This article reviews the proposed amendments and their potential impact in the view of practitioners of arbitration. The research and analysis involve a desktop study of the proposed amendments and comments received during the public consultation period; survey questionnaire of practitioners and academics; followed by semi-structured interviews with practitioners and academics. This research and analysis will conclude that the proposed amendments will advance arbitration as a viable alternative to litigation and maintain, if not further advance, Hong Kong as a preferred venue for arbitration.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationConstruction law journal, 2010, v. 26 no. 5, p. 379-396-
dcterms.isPartOfConstruction law journal-
dcterms.issued2010-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr54896-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mau_Proposed_New_Arbitration.pdf91.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

160
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

212
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.