Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Peer assessment of language proficiency
Authors: Cheng, W 
Warren, M 
Issue Date: Jan-2005
Source: Language testing, Jan. 2005, v. 22, no. 1, p. 93-121
Abstract: This article describes part of an investigation into the reliability and potential benefits of incorporating peer assessment into English language programmes. Undergraduate Engineering students attending a university in Hong Kong were asked to assess the English language proficiency of their peers - among other assessment criteria, such as preparation, content, organisation, and delivery - as exhibited in the seminar, oral presentation and written report of an integrated group project. The paper compares the students' attitudes towards assessing both the English language proficiency and other aspects of performance of their peers. It also compares peer and teacher assessments. The findings suggest that students had a less positive attitude towards assessing their peers' language proficiency, but they did not score their peers' language proficiency very differently from the other assessment criteria. Students and teachers were different in their respective marking behaviours and the ways oral and written language proficiency were interpreted. While students derived benefits from the peer assessment exercise, a question mark hangs over incorporating peer assessment for both language proficiency and the other criteria into the regular assessment process until such differences are resolved. Suggestions are made for improvement in procedures and future research.
Keywords: English language proficiency
Peer assessment
Publisher: Edward Arnold
Journal: Language testing 
ISSN: 0265-5322
DOI: 10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
Rights: © 2005 Edward Arnold (Publishers), Sage Publications.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LT_298.pdfPre-published version351.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of May 28, 2023


Citations as of May 28, 2023


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of May 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.