Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English-
dc.creatorCheng, W-
dc.creatorWarren, M-
dc.identifier.issn1356-2517 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn1470-1294 (online)-
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing (Routledge)en_US
dc.rights© 2000 Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsThis is an electronic version of an article published in W. Cheng and M. Warren (2000), Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243-255. Teaching in Higher Education is available online at, and the article at:
dc.subjectPeer assessmenten_US
dc.subjectGroup worken_US
dc.subjectAssessment in higher educationen_US
dc.subjectGroup projecten_US
dc.subjectIndividual weighting factoren_US
dc.subjectFinal individual student marken_US
dc.subjectFinal group project marken_US
dc.titleMaking a difference : using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project.en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dcterms.abstractOvercoming the potential dilemma of awarding the same grade to a group of students for group work assignments, regardless of the contribution made by each group member, is a problem facing teachers who ask their students to work collaboratively together on assessed group tasks. In this paper, we report on the procedures to factor in the contributions of individual group members engaged in an integrated group project using peer assessment procedures. Our findings demonstrate that the method we used resulted in a substantially wider spread of marks being given to individual students. Almost every student was awarded a numerical score which was higher or lower than a simple group project mark would have been. When these numerical scores were converted into the final letter grades, approximately one third of the students received a grade for the group project that was different from the grade that they would have received if the same grade had been awarded to all group members. Based on these preliminary findings we conclude that peer assessment can be usefully and meaningfully employed to factor individual contributions into the grades awarded to students engaged in collaborative group work.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTeaching in higher education, Apr. 2000, v. 5, no. 2, p. 243-255-
dcterms.isPartOfTeaching in higher education-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
making a difference.pdfPre-published version446.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 3, 2022


Citations as of Jul 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.