Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/5628
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorCheung, E-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:27:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:27:32Z-
dc.identifier.issn0742-597X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/5628-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Management in Engineering. The open URL of the article: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000044en_US
dc.subjectInfrastructureen_US
dc.subjectPartnershipsen_US
dc.subjectPrivate sectoren_US
dc.subjectProcurementen_US
dc.titleEvaluation model for assessing the suitability of public-private partnership projectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage80-
dc.identifier.epage89-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000044-
dcterms.abstractThis paper presents an evaluation model useful for assessing the suitability of public-private partnership (PPP) projects by studying their attractive and negative factors. A survey of industrial practitioners in Hong Kong was conducted. Respondents were asked to rank the importance of 15 attractive and 13 negative factors for adopting PPP. From the rankings, relative weights of each factor were derived. The weights of these factors formed the basis for the evaluation model presented in this paper. The Hong Kong Zhuhai Macau Bridge was used to demonstrate how this evaluation model could be applied. From the list of attractive and negative factors the writers selected those that were foreseeable in this project. Calculating the total weights of each group of factors showed that negative factors outweighed attractive factors by 27%. The result indicated that PPP would not be a suitable method for delivering this project. The evaluation model presented in this paper can help both the public and private sectors to assess whether potential public projects are suited for PPP.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of management in engineering, Apr. 2011, v. 27, no. 2, p. 80–89-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of management in engineering-
dcterms.issued2011-04-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000289842500004-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955431073-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5479-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr52773-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cheung_Evaluation_Model_Public-Private.pdfPre-published version1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

226
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

718
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.