Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4505
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorChien, WT-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:25:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:25:51Z-
dc.identifier.issn2039-4403-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4505-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPAGEPressen_US
dc.rights©W.T. Chien 2011. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0).en_US
dc.subjectPeer reviewen_US
dc.subjectNursing journalsen_US
dc.subjectReadershipen_US
dc.titleProcess and quality of peer review in scientific nursing journalsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage21-
dc.identifier.epage23]-
dc.identifier.volume1-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/nursrep.2011.e5-
dcterms.abstractTo be high quality and international recognized scientific journal for health care professions, such as medical and nursing disciplines, a well-structured and effective peer review system is of an utmost importance. Beckstead (2009) in his guest editorial published in the September issue of International Journal of Nursing Studies suggested that it was important for authors, as well as editors and publishers, to have a clear understanding of whom the intended readers of the journal are; and for the peer reviewers, to answer a key question: whom are we writing to? and more importantly, to assure a transparent, rigorous and quality peer-review. Their questions and declarations stimulated us to think about two important issues: first, the importance of a high quality and effective peer-review in a scientific nursing journal and second, the peer-review system, its monitoring and contribution to quality improvement.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNursing reports, 2011, v. 1, no. 1, p. [21-23]-
dcterms.isPartOfNursing reports-
dcterms.issued2011-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr61064-
dc.description.ros2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
chien_process_and_quality.pdf276.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

110
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

105
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.