Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4491
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorShek, DTL-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn1049-7315-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4491-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2010en_US
dc.subjectSubjective outcome evaluationen_US
dc.subjectObjective outcome evaluationen_US
dc.subjectClient satisfaction approachen_US
dc.subjectChinese adolescentsen_US
dc.subjectPositive youth developmenten_US
dc.titleSubjective outcome and objective outcome evaluation findings : insights from a Chinese contexten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage293-
dc.identifier.epage301-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049731509331951-
dcterms.abstractObjective: As there are few studies examining the relationship between subjective and objective outcome evaluation findings, this study investigated the linkage between these two types of outcomes in the Chinese culture. Method: In an experimental study, 3,298 Chinese secondary school students responded to the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale assessing objective outcome (CPYDS) at pretest and posttest. They also responded to the Chinese Subjective Outcome Scale (CSOS) assessing subjective outcome at posttest. Results: The CSOS total and subscale scores were significantly correlated with posttest CPYDS scores and difference scores; they also predicted changes in CPYDS scores across time. Conclusions: The present findings demystify the common belief that findings based on the client satisfaction approach are unrelated to objective outcome evaluation findings.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationResearch on social work practice, May 2010, v. 20, no. 3, p. 293-301-
dcterms.isPartOfResearch on social work practice-
dcterms.issued2010-05-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000277082600005-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77951870351-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-7581-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr49075-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
B18.pdfPre-published version94.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

148
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

380
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

79
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Jul 3, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.