Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/31458
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorYu, DTWen_US
dc.creatorJones, AYMen_US
dc.creatorPang, MYCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-26T08:12:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-26T08:12:28Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/31458-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Yu, David Tai Wai, et al. “Development and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale: An Exploratory and Methodological Study.” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 3, Sept. 2012, pp. 214–221, Copyright © 2012 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2012 World Stroke Organization. DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010145en_US
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of the chinese version of the massachusetts general hospital acupuncture sensation scale : an exploratory and methodological studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage214en_US
dc.identifier.epage221en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/acupmed-2012-010145en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: The Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (MASS) is a tool to measure needle sensations. The aims of the present study were to develop a Chinese version and to assess its psychometric properties.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: This study was a methodological and exploratory study. The English version of the MASS was translated into Chinese using standardised translation procedures. Content validity was conducted by nine acupuncture experts. The prefinal Chinese version (C-MASS) was then administered to 30 acupuncture-naïve, healthy subjects. Electroacupuncture was performed on the right LI4 and LI11 acupoints for 30 min. A test–retest reliability measurement was administered 1–2 weeks later. Construct validity was examined by comparing results from C-MASS and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). The construct validity was further assessed by the principle component analysis.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: C-MASS demonstrated a content validity ratio on relevance and importance from −0.04 to 1.00. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with the sensory dimension of SF-MPQ (γ=0.63, p<0.05). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by its low association with the affective dimension of SF-MPQ (γ=−0.3, p=0.111). A five-factor structure of C-MASS was established by factor analysis. C-MASS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.71) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.92). Since the descriptor ‘sharp pain’ was not a valid needle sensation related to deqi, this was removed from C-MASS. We renamed the scale as the Modified MASS-Chinese version (C-MMASS).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: A 12-descriptor C-MMASS was established and shown to be a reliable and valid tool in reporting needle sensations associated with deqi among healthy young Chinese people.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAcupuncture in medicine, 1 Sept. 2012, v. 30, no. 3, p. 214-221en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAcupuncture in Medicineen_US
dcterms.issued2012-09-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000308740300010-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866728206-
dc.identifier.pmid22617434-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr62863-
dc.description.ros2012-2013 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscript-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0587-n12, a0687-n01-
dc.identifier.SubFormID300, 927-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0587_n12_AAM_Deqi-manuscript-Acupuncture-in-Medicine-revised-clean1.pdfPre-Published version385.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

170
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

324
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

54
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 8, 2026

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

55
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.