Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/30870
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Health Technology and Informatics | en_US |
| dc.contributor | School of Optometry | en_US |
| dc.creator | Leung, TW | en_US |
| dc.creator | Flitcroft, DI | en_US |
| dc.creator | Wallman, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Lee, TH | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zheng, Y | en_US |
| dc.creator | Lam, CSY | en_US |
| dc.creator | Kee, CS | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-14T01:28:01Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-14T01:28:01Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0275-5408 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/30870 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2011 The College of Optometrists | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Leung, T.-w., Flitcroft, D.I., Wallman, J., Lee, T.H., Zheng, Y., Lam, C.S.-y. and Kee, C.-s. (2011), A novel instrument for logging nearwork distance. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31: 137-144., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00814.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Instrument | en_US |
| dc.subject | Myopia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Near working distance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reading habits | en_US |
| dc.subject | Refractive error | en_US |
| dc.title | A novel instrument for logging nearwork distance | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 137 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 144 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00814.x | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Purpose: To validate a novel ultrasonic sensor for logging reading distances. In addition, this device was used to compare the habitual reading distances between low and high myopes. Methods: First, the stability and sensitivity of the ultrasonic device were determined by repeated measures using artificial targets. Then, thirty Hong Kong Chinese (20-30years) were recruited, of whom fifteen were considered to be high myopes (mean±S.D.=-8.7±0.5D) and 15 to be low to non-myopes (mean±S.D.=-2.0±0.2D). Each subject read a newspaper with their habitual visual aid continuously for 10min in two sessions at their preferred working distance(s). The reading distances were recorded continuously using a novel nearwork analyzer. The modal working distance was considered as the 'habitual' reading distance. In addition, habitual reading distance was reported orally by each subject. Results: The nearwork analyzer gave accurate and repeatable measurements over a range of distances and angles. Using this instrument, high myopes were found to have a significantly shorter reading distance than low myopes or non-myopes (mean±S.D.=35.9±9.8cm vs 50.9±24.8cm; two-sample t-test, p=0.04, df=18). The reading distances reported orally by the subjects were not correlated with those recorded by the nearwork analyzer. Conclusions: The nearwork analyzer was found to be an effective tool for measuring nearwork reading distance in a small group of emmetropic and myopic adults over a 10min interval. Differences between the reading distance between high myopes and low/non-myopes was detected by the device. Further study is needed to determine if a closer working distance is a cause or effect of myopia development. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Ophthalmic and physiological optics, Mar. 2011, v. 31, no. 2, p. 137-144 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Ophthalmic and physiological optics | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2011-03 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000287197600004 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-79751495334 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1475-1313 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r55826 | - |
| dc.description.ros | 2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0815-n01 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 1826 | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | J-BB7P | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1826_Leung 2011._Nearwork Analyzer.pdf | Pre-Published version | 2.83 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
224
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 6, 2025
Downloads
170
Citations as of Oct 6, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
Last Week
1
1
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
23
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



