Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/2502
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorChan, MF-
dc.creatorTse, HMS-
dc.creatorDay, MC-
dc.creatorTong, TF-
dc.creatorSuen, KPL-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:27:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn1022-2464-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/2502-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Nursingen_US
dc.rights© 2003 School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.en_US
dc.subjectSurvey researchen_US
dc.subjectIncentivesen_US
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.titleRandomized trial of use of incentive to increase the response rate to a mailed surveyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Tong M. F. Chanen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Sonny H. M. Tseen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Mary C. Dayen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Edmond T. F. Tongen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Lorna K. P. Suenen_US
dc.identifier.spage36-
dc.identifier.epage43-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dcterms.abstractLow response rates, especially among health-care professionals, are a common problem in mailed survey research. We conducted a randomized trial to examine the effects of cash incentives on response rates. A total of 3,335 Chinese medicine practitioners were randomized to one of two interventions accompanying a mailed survey - no incentive (n=1,667), and monetary incentives in two levels at HK$20, and HK$30 (n=834 in each group) on receipt of the returned questionnaire. The response rates were higher among those offered incentives than those without (34.7% vs. 28.5%, X²=14.34, p<0.001). but no significant differences were found between incentives at HK$20 and HK$30 (X²=0.16, p=0.69). Although offered incentives can increase response rates, no incentive was the most cost-effective, in terms of cost per respondent (HK$21.90 per respondent). However, this study focuses on CMPs, the findings may not represent the response rate for all health-care professions in Hong Kong. In fact, the largest population in the health care system in Hong Kong is nurses. Therefore, we cannot conclude that a money enclosure would have been more effective for all health-care professionals. Also, further systematic study of the effects of different incentive strategies in other related research should be encouraged.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAsian journal of nursing studies (亞洲護理學雜誌), Aug. 2003, v. 6, no. 3, p. 36-43-
dcterms.isPartOfAsian journal of nursing studies (亞洲護理學雜誌)-
dcterms.issued2003-08-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr19454-
dc.description.ros2003-2004 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AJNS15.pdf2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

221
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

209
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.