Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/24959
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorLi, H-
dc.creatorCheung, CCH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-13T08:27:33Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-13T08:27:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn0925-8558-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/24959-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Li, H., & Cheung, C. C. H. (2015). Focus intervention effects in Mandarin multiple wh-questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 24(4), 361-382 is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10831-015-9134-1. The final publication is available at link.springer.comen_US
dc.subjectAssociation with focusen_US
dc.subjectFeature-sharing view of Agreeen_US
dc.subjectFocus intervention effectsen_US
dc.subjectMandarinen_US
dc.subjectMultiple wh-questionsen_US
dc.subjectRelativized minimalityen_US
dc.titleFocus intervention effects in Mandarin multiple wh-questionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10831-015-9134-1-
dcterms.abstractIn this paper, we investigate focus intervention effects in Mandarin multiple wh-questions, showing that such effects arise only if a focus particle and its focus associate intervene between the interrogative complementizer C[Q] and one or more in-situ wh-phrases. We further show that focus intervention effects are not observed when a focus particle takes all the in-situ wh-phrases in its c-command domain as its focus associates. Adopting Pesetsky and Torrego's (in: Karimi et al. (eds.) Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, in honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 2007) feature-sharing view of Agree, we propose that the dependency between C[Q] and an in-situ wh-phrase can be reduced to an Agree relation. In addition, adopting Rizzi’s (in: Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 2004) refined version of Relativized Minimality, we propose that focus intervention effects are induced by the presence of a Focus Phrase that prohibits C[Q] from establishing proper dependencies with the in-situ wh-phrases.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of East Asian linguistics, Nov. 2015, v. 24, no. 4, p. 361-382-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of East Asian linguistics-
dcterms.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938675293-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-8560-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2015000273-
dc.description.ros2015-2016 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Focus_intervention_effects_in_Mandarin_multiple_wh-questions.pdfPre-published version242.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

181
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

297
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.