Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/14459
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.creatorLam, AKC-
dc.creatorTse, JSH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T01:32:45Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-14T01:32:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn1989-1342-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/14459-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpanish Council of Optometryen_US
dc.rights© 2013 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lam, A. K., & Jimmy, S. H. (2014). Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens. Journal of optometry, 7(2), 91-99 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2013.07.005en_US
dc.subjectCorneal hysteresisen_US
dc.subjectCorneal resistance factoren_US
dc.subjectIntraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectLens modulusen_US
dc.subjectOcular pulse amplitudeen_US
dc.titleDynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lensen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage91-
dc.identifier.epage99-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.optom.2013.07.005-
dcterms.abstractPurpose This study compared the measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) using the Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) over silicone hydrogel contact lenses of different modulus. Corneal biomechanics were also measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Methods Forty-seven young (mean age 22.3 years, standard deviation 1.2 years) subjects had IOP, OPA, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) measured without lens and with two brands of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Each eye wore one brand followed by another, randomly assigned, and then the lenses switched over. Difference and agreement of IOP and OPA with and without silicone hydrogel contact lens were studied. Results The right and left eyes had similar corneal curvatures, central corneal thicknesses, IOP, OPA and corneal biomechanics at baseline. No significant difference was found in CH and CRF when they were measured over different contact lenses. IOP demonstrated a greater difference (95% limits of agreement: 2.73 mmHg) compared with no lens when it was measured over high modulus silicone hydrogel lenses. Agreement improved over low lens modulus silicone hydrogel lenses (95% limits of agreement: 2.2-2.4 mmHg). 95% limits of agreement were within 1.0 mmHg for OPA. Conclusions This study demonstrated the feasibility of DCT over silicone hydrogel lenses. Low lens modulus silicone hydrogel contact lens in situ has no clinical effect on DCT.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of optometry, 2014, v. 7, no. 2, p. 91-99-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of Optometry-
dcterms.issued2014-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84899482239-
dc.identifier.pmid24766866-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr69445-
dc.description.ros2013-2014 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lam_Dynamic_Contour_Tonometry.pdf927.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

180
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

67
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.