Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1314
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorWang, WC-
dc.creatorChau, KW-
dc.creatorCheng, C-
dc.creatorQiu, L-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:21Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:21Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/1314-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsJournal of Hydrology © 2009 Elsevier B.V. The journal web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com.en_US
dc.subjectMonthly discharge time series forecastingen_US
dc.subjectAutoregressive moving-average (ARMA)en_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural network (ANN)en_US
dc.subjectAdaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)en_US
dc.subjectGenetic programming (GP)en_US
dc.subjectSupport vector machine (SVM)en_US
dc.titleA comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time seriesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Chun-Tian Chengen_US
dc.identifier.spage294-
dc.identifier.epage306-
dc.identifier.volume374-
dc.identifier.issue3-4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019-
dcterms.abstractDeveloping a hydrological forecasting model based on past records is crucial to effective hydropower reservoir management and scheduling. Traditionally, time series analysis and modeling is used for building mathematical models to generate hydrologic records in hydrology and water resources. Artificial intelligence (AI), as a branch of computer science, is capable of analyzing long-series and large-scale hydrological data. In recent years, it is one of front issues to apply AI technology to the hydrological forecasting modeling. In this paper, autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models, artificial neural networks (ANNs) approaches, adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques, genetic programming (GP) models and support vector machine (SVM) method are examined using the long-term observations of monthly river flow discharges. The four quantitative standard statistical performance evaluation measures, the coefficient of correlation (R), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (E), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), are employed to evaluate the performances of various models developed. Two case study river sites are also provided to illustrate their respective performances. The results indicate that the best performance can be obtained by ANFIS, GP and SVM, in terms of different evaluation criteria during the training and validation phases.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hydrology, 15 Aug. 2009, v. 374, no. 3-4, p. 294-306-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hydrology-
dcterms.issued2009-08-15-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000269851000010-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-68349105875-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr46648-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JH8.pdfPre-published version807.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

244
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

3,300
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

668
Last Week
4
Last month
3
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

587
Last Week
0
Last month
6
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.