Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1314
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | - |
dc.creator | Wang, WC | - |
dc.creator | Chau, KW | - |
dc.creator | Cheng, C | - |
dc.creator | Qiu, L | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:24:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:24:21Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1694 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1314 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Journal of Hydrology © 2009 Elsevier B.V. The journal web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com. | en_US |
dc.subject | Monthly discharge time series forecasting | en_US |
dc.subject | Autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial neural network (ANN) | en_US |
dc.subject | Adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) | en_US |
dc.subject | Genetic programming (GP) | en_US |
dc.subject | Support vector machine (SVM) | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this publication: Chun-Tian Cheng | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 294 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 306 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 374 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3-4 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019 | - |
dcterms.abstract | Developing a hydrological forecasting model based on past records is crucial to effective hydropower reservoir management and scheduling. Traditionally, time series analysis and modeling is used for building mathematical models to generate hydrologic records in hydrology and water resources. Artificial intelligence (AI), as a branch of computer science, is capable of analyzing long-series and large-scale hydrological data. In recent years, it is one of front issues to apply AI technology to the hydrological forecasting modeling. In this paper, autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models, artificial neural networks (ANNs) approaches, adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques, genetic programming (GP) models and support vector machine (SVM) method are examined using the long-term observations of monthly river flow discharges. The four quantitative standard statistical performance evaluation measures, the coefficient of correlation (R), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (E), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), are employed to evaluate the performances of various models developed. Two case study river sites are also provided to illustrate their respective performances. The results indicate that the best performance can be obtained by ANFIS, GP and SVM, in terms of different evaluation criteria during the training and validation phases. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of hydrology, 15 Aug. 2009, v. 374, no. 3-4, p. 294-306 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of hydrology | - |
dcterms.issued | 2009-08-15 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000269851000010 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-68349105875 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r46648 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
JH8.pdf | Pre-published version | 807.45 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
346
Last Week
3
3
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
3,659
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
714
Last Week
4
4
Last month
3
3
Citations as of May 8, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
620
Last Week
0
0
Last month
6
6
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.