Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/120953
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Accounting and Finance | en_US |
| dc.creator | Liu, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zhang, D | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-03T01:29:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-03T01:29:25Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0010-4140 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/120953 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Sage Publications, Inc. | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the accepted version of the publication Liu, S., & Zhang, D. (2026). Charity Begins at Home: Domestic Political Economy of Chinese Foreign Aid. Comparative Political Studies, 59(8), 1601-1641. Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/00104140251349668. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Authoritarian regimes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Foreign aid | en_US |
| dc.subject | International trade | en_US |
| dc.subject | State capitalism | en_US |
| dc.title | Charity begins at home : domestic political economy of Chinese foreign aid | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1601 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1641 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 59 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/00104140251349668 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | How does an authoritarian donor’s domestic political economy shape its aid practices? We probe into the case of China, the largest authoritarian donor in the world, and contend that the logic of regime survival drives China’s aid policies to prioritize commercial interests and sustain the state capitalism model. By leveraging multiple data sources, we employ a difference-in-differences design and conduct our analysis at the country, industry, firm, and product levels. We empirically document that Chinese aid projects lead to a substantial surge of Chinese exports to aid recipient countries, generating large revenues primarily for Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). In particular, the aid-induced trade benefits are concentrated among SOEs with low performance and large employment. Our analysis also rules out decreased trade costs, favorable trade terms, and the product price difference between SOEs and private firms as alternative explanations. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Comparative political studies, July 2026, v. 59, no. 8, p. 1601-1641 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Comparative political studies | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1552-3829 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202609 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a4798 [Non-PolyU] | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 53925 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu_Charity_Begins_Home.pdf | 547.48 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



