Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/120948
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorMa, Hen_US
dc.creatorLu, Sen_US
dc.creatorLee, CKMen_US
dc.creatorMoktadir, MAen_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-03T00:59:18Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-03T00:59:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0968-0802en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/120948-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.subjectESGen_US
dc.subjectHybrid weighting methoden_US
dc.subjectMultiple-criteria decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectSoftmax transformationen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.titleComprehensive ESG assessment framework for metro industry : a softmax enhanced hybrid weighting methoden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sd.71370en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study seeks to answer how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indicators can be selected, weighted, and interpreted for the metro industry, while generic ESG frameworks are unable to explore sustainability challenges for the metro industry. Using 2022–2024 operational and ESG disclosure data from two leading metro operators in Asia and Europe, this study develops a sector-specific ESG indicator system and applies a softmax-enhanced hybrid weighting model that integrates DEMATEL and LOPCOW. Fuzzy DEMATEL helps capture causal interdependencies among indicators, LOPCOW derives objective weights from operational data, and the softmax transformation improves discrimination among closely weighted indicators. The results show that social indicators dominate the metro ESG structure, accounting for approximately 81.3% of total priority weight. Furthermore, the three most important indicators are average age, employee turnover rate, and total number of employees, which together represent about 41.0% of the overall ESG priority weight. The findings indicate that workforce structure, retention, and staffing capacity are not only social performance measures but also economically significant levers for operational continuity, service reliability, and long-term resource efficiency. Governance oversight also functions as a causal driver, while environmental indicators appear largely as outcomes influenced by social and governance conditions. The study contributes theoretically by advancing sector-specific ESG materiality and methodologically by reducing weight-compression in MCDM models. In practice, it offers metro operators and policymakers a prioritization tool to align ESG investment, human resource planning, and governance reform with sustainable infrastructure development.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable Development, First published: 01 July 2026, Early View, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71370en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043477697-
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1719en_US
dc.description.validate202609 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG002272/2026-08-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, RN1M; MTR Research Funding Scheme, PTU-23001.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo0000-00-00 (to be updated)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 0000-00-00 (to be updated)
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.